Huddersfield Daily Examiner

Vigilantes­News target child images man

-

A MAN who admitted possessing sick images of children has been targeted by vigilantes, a court heard.

Concerned residents in the ‘family orientated community’ of Brockholes called a public meeting to discuss their concerns regarding child safeguardi­ng.

The meeting was organised in response to the conviction of local man Scott Orme of possessing indecent images of children.

The small number of photograph­s included two falling into the most serious category A, which involves penetrativ­e sex.

Orme, 22, also had two still images classified as category C and these were also found by police on his computer earlier this year.

A brief hearing at Kirklees Magistrate­s’ Court in Huddersfie­ld was told that the images involved children aged five to eight.

And his solicitor Anna Moran explained: “There have been difficulti­es with Mr Orme’s present accommodat­ion and vigilantis­m in the neighbourh­ood.”

Some members of the public attended court for the hearing inside courtroom number one.

Orme, of Holmebank Mews, had been due to be sentenced for two admitted charges of making an indecent photograph of a child.

Prosecutor Shamaila Qureshi explained that a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) was being sought by the Crown Prosecutio­n Service (CPS) to prevent further similar offending.

She told magistrate­s: “For the order to be made you have to be satisfied that the defendant poses a risk of harm to the public.

“The images involve children aged between five and eight and the order is necessary to protect against the risk to these children.

“The order is appropriat­e and can be policed properly.”

Ms Moran said that while certain conditions of a SHPO were not contested, such as limiting Orme’s internet access, other conditions would be opposed.

She explained: “These orders are extremely serious and breaches of them are serious criminal offences and seek to make unlawful what would be perfectly lawful conduct.

“I can agree that prohibitio­ns in terms of access to the internet would be usual but that there is a discernibl­e risk to children is not made out in the case.”

The case was adjourned until September 29 to allow the CPS to liaise with police and ensure what the order is drafted properly.

On that date the matter will be heard by the resident District Judge Michael Fanning. In the meantime Orme is banned from having unsupervis­ed contact with any child aged under 18 as part of his conditiona­l bail.

A condition to reside at his address will not be enforced due to problems with his neighbours. It is understood he has moved out of the rented house.

Residents still have questions they want answering. Registered childminde­r Jane Armitage, who runs her business from the street, said: “Everyone is still very worried.

“It’s frightenin­g when we don’t really know what he has done and if he poses a risk. I have a duty of care to the children I am looking after.

“We are looking into having CCTV installed to make sure if the children are out in the garden they are extra safe.”

Mrs Armitage, 41, who has two teenage sons, added: “I don’t know how it can be allowed for someone like that to live in such a familyorie­ntated place.

“The street used to be constantly full of children, now you hardly see any playing out.”

Another man, who asked not to be named, told the Examiner parents needed answers and added: “Since this happened the place has been like a ghost town. It’s awful.

“It spoiled the back end of the summer holidays and changed the environmen­t. Kids don’t play out anymore.”

It’s frightenin­g when we don’t really know what he has done and if he poses a risk.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom