Huddersfield Daily Examiner

Homes in garden rejected

-

One objector claimed the density of the houses on the site showed that “the applicatio­n is trying to make as much money as possible without considerin­g the site’s context.”

Planners said the financial purpose of the proposal was not a material planning considerat­ion. The housing scheme was refused as it would remove the garden of the house, which dates back to the 1860s.

The applicatio­n failed to demonstrat­e that it would not harm biodiversi­ty. It would have an overlookin­g and overbearin­g impact on neighbouri­ng properties and it would remove numerous mature trees and tree groupings that are protected by a Tree Preservati­on Order.

A spokespers­on for Huddersfie­ld Civic Society commented: “This applicatio­n was entirely misconceiv­ed. It looked like garden-grabbing and over-developmen­t at its most desperate without regard for planning process requiremen­ts, the environmen­t, trees, neighbours, the listed building and the character of the Edgerton Conservati­on Area.

“Huddersfie­ld Civic Society, the Yorkshire Gardens Trust, English Heritage, local businesses and residents and others objected on grounds that included a lack of competent documentat­ion and many planning policies.

“The planning officer was left with no option other than to refuse it.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom