Huddersfield Daily Examiner

‘If history has taught us anything, it’s that Kirklees is resilient and resourcefu­l’ ’

ON THE 50TH ANNIVERSAR­Y OF THE FORMATION OF THE BOROUGH, COUNCIL LEADER PAYS TRIBUTE TO ITS RESIDENTS, VOLUNTEERS AND ORGANISATI­ONS

- By ABIGAIL MARLOW

KIRKLEES may be celebratin­g its 50th anniversar­y, but is it time for a divorce?

Councillor­s across the political spectrum have had their say on the borough as we know it today.

The borough of Kirklees was shaped by the Local Government Act of 1972. This act, which came into effect in 1974, completely revamped the way local government functioned in England, and redrew many traditiona­l boundaries.

Prior to April 1, 1974, the towns and villages within the modern borough of Kirklees were governed very differentl­y from how they are today. The towns of Huddersfie­ld and Dewsbury were County Boroughs, which meant they were governed independen­tly of county council control.

Batley and Spenboroug­h were municipal boroughs, which had their own town councils, whilst the remaining area was covered by the urban districts of Colne Valley, Denby Dale, Heckmondwi­ke, Holmfirth, Kirkburton, Meltham and Mirfield.

These small boroughs and districts were brought together in 1974 under the collective banner of Kirklees after a public poll decided that the new region should be named after Kirklees Priory, the supposed resting place of Robin Hood – although the land of Kirklees Hall, located near Brighouse, sits mostly within Calderdale.

The amalgamati­on of so many towns with distinct identities has been a cause of discomfort for some over the past 50 years. Most notably, in the 1990s, the MPs for Colne Valley and Batley and Spen, Conservati­ves Graham Riddick and Elizabeth Peacock, campaigned to split the borough between Huddersfie­ld and Dewsbury.

When Kirklees’ anniversar­y was round the corner, we asked local councillor­s whether they felt it was a matter worth celebratin­g.

Leader of the Council, Clr Cathy Scott, said: “As Kirklees approaches its 50th anniversar­y this April, it’s certainly an occasion that gives us pause for thought and reflection. I feel that the attention should, deservedly, be on the people and communitie­s that have shaped Kirklees

over these five decades.

“I’d like to extend my heartfelt gratitude to the residents of Kirklees, whose commitment and dedication have been the key to our successes. From social workers changing children’s lives to teachers offering countless opportunit­ies, from council workers making our home a greener, safer place to businesses driving our economy forward – it’s the collective effort of individual­s and groups that makes Kirklees such a special place.

“Not forgetting the countless voluntary organisati­ons whose unwavering work to better the lives of Kirklees residents has enriched our communitie­s beyond measure. Their selflessne­ss and resilience, especially in the face of adversity, exemplify the spirit of Kirklees.

“As we commemorat­e the past 50 years, we also look ahead with opti

mism and determinat­ion. Challenges will undoubtedl­y arise, but if history has taught us anything, it’s that Kirklees is resilient and resourcefu­l. We have the opportunit­y to draw inspiratio­n from our past to build a brighter future for the next 50 years.”

Leader of the Green Group, Cllr Andrew Cooper felt differentl­y and said: “Kirklees doesn’t exist.

“Kirklees Priory after which it is named was situated in Calderdale and was according to legend associated with the death of Robin Hood who robbed from the rich to give to the poor. Or progressiv­e taxation as it is more generally known.

“For 50 years we have had a council

with a contrived identity with a name chosen as a compromise and a convenienc­e, which has satisfied no one.

“As a supposedly democratic body, Kirklees falls short. At the last local elections, the ruling Party won 43 percent of the vote but has 100 percent of the power. The vast majority of its decisions are taken by the nine councillor­s in the Cabinet with the other 60 councillor­s having no vote on the important decisions that people elected them to address.

“Ultimately we need a fair voting system in this country for both local and national elections but we have parties who rely on an undemocrat­ic system working for them rather than voters.”

Councillor Cooper described the Conservati­ves’ idea to split Kirklees along North-South lines as “cynical, vote-grabbing nonsense that can’t be delivered”. He suggested that one way to improve things in Kirklees would be by moving to a committee system where every councillor votes on all decisions.

The councillor also argued that new town councils could be created for a more local focus without the need to abolish Kirklees.

He added: “Under the Localism Act 2011. Five percent of local electors can trigger a referendum to change the way the Kirklees is governed or seven and a half percent to create new Town Councils. And if people back those referenda we can move from an undemocrat­ic Cabinet System to a more democratic Committee system. It happened in Sheffield. Why not in

Kirklees?”

Leader of the Conservati­ve Group, Cllr David Hall said: “Although it is an interestin­g fact that Kirklees Council was formed 50 years ago, I doubt whether many will particular­ly be celebratin­g this milestone, as Kirklees as an entity has never been universall­y popular.

“While we have much cause to celebrate our communitie­s and all that our wonderful residents achieve, Kirklees itself remains to me a bureaucrat­ic construct to which I attach little affection.

“Perhaps, given that the Labour administra­tion have got the council into such terrible financial straits, they should spend less time partying and more time sorting out their own mess?”

Leader of the Kirklees Community Independen­ts Group, Cllr Jo Lawson, said: “Kirklees at 50 does have cause to celebrate, within Kirklees Council we have many officers who daily go above and beyond for our residents while working under great pressure and financial constraint. Many will look longingly to the days of the Huddersfie­ld and Dewsbury town councils but thanks to central government austerity cuts much would still be the same.

“We have amazing faith groups, community groups and individual­s who often do not realise how important the hours they put in really are for residents living within Kirklees.

Within Crosland Moor & Netherton there are some amazing individual­s who have done so much over the years to improve the local area and provide help and support for so many. From coffee mornings, craft groups, sporting activities, school holiday clubs, events in the park, financial advice/support, the Bread and Butter Thing and so much more.

“Hopefully the next 50 years will not be as challengin­g as some of the last 50 have been.”

Holme Valley North Independen­t, Cllr Charles Greaves, said: “While there has been a lot of change for the good in Kirklees over the last 50 years, there is no more love for Kirklees now than there was when it was created. I believe in decisions being made by the people who will be affected by them.

“The 100,000 people who live in the Valleys would do so much better with a council that actually represents them. I would love to see Kirklees split up, but every election time the Conservati­ves claim they will split it but then do nothing. 14 years later we’re still waiting. You’d think it was just a cynical ploy to get some votes.”

“Only the government can split Kirklees and in recent years they have been forcing councils to merge. So I asked my MP Jason McCartney how it could be done but he would only give a vague reply, and another senior Conservati­ve [Adam Gregg] talked about spending millions to just rebrand Kirklees – but what is the point of a new name and colour

scheme? It would still be the same old Kirklees! So I wrote to Michael Gove MP asking him what it would take to get approval. His reply was disappoint­ing – he made it clear that without a sound financial position, he would not allow it.

“So if the government won’t allow us to split Kirklees, we should do the next best thing and introduce a committee system with devolved districts. This would give much greater freedom to local areas to pursue their own priorities – and perhaps the Valleys might see a fairer share of the funding!

“After 50 years, I can celebrate the hard work of council staff, our great schools, our community spirit, our local groups and active residents, and our resilience in the face of national and local politics, but as for Kirklees, I’d rather have the Districts back.”

Leader of the Lib Dems, Cllr John Lawson said: “As Kirklees reaches 50 I think it’s appropriat­e to mark the occasion by celebratin­g the people, communitie­s and the workforce that have worked so hard to provide the volunteeri­ng and everyday core services that we need.

“It’s often problemati­c to ‘celebrate’ an organisati­on in itself as they sometimes have mixed histories for different people and Kirklees is no different.

“I think that the Civic Office along with Mayor Burke have chosen a fitting way to applaud our communitie­s by initiating the formal recognitio­n of the work of local champions who volunteer in their areas.

“It’s these individual­s and groups who represent the best of what we aspire to be as a Council. So as we reflect on the journey of the last 50 years we’d do well to look at what we can learn as we choose the path for the future.”

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? The various towns and villages were separate boroughs before being joined together as Kirklees in 1974
The various towns and villages were separate boroughs before being joined together as Kirklees in 1974
 ?? ?? Clr Cathy Scott, leader of Kirklees Council
Clr Cathy Scott, leader of Kirklees Council
 ?? ?? Huddersfie­ld is the largest town within Kikrlees
Huddersfie­ld is the largest town within Kikrlees
 ?? ?? Clr Charles Greaves
Clr Charles Greaves
 ?? ?? Clr Andrew Cooper
Clr Andrew Cooper
 ?? ?? Clr John Lawson
Clr John Lawson
 ?? ?? Clr Jo Lawson
Clr Jo Lawson
 ?? ?? Clr David Hall
Clr David Hall

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom