iPad&iPhone user

Is iPhone set to get facial recognitio­n?

Apple could be about to take the next step past Touch ID when it comes to securing our phones,

- writes Dan Moren

It’s never too early to start speculatin­g about the next iPhone, even if it’s not due out for more than six months. We’ve got the usual ‘edge-to-edge display’ and ‘virtual Home button’ rumours that seem to circulate about every iPhone, but we’ve also noticed reports congregati­ng in another area lately: biometric security.

The iPhone has, of course, offered biometric security in the form of Touch ID since the iPhone 5s was released in 2013. That technology expanded to the iPad and, more recently, to the MacBook Pro.

But in recent weeks we’ve seen a few suggestion­s that new technologi­es might supplement – or replace – Touch ID in the upcoming iPhone. Is that likely, or wishful thinking?

Iris scanning

It’s a staple of science fiction: you put your eye up to a camera, which scans it and compares it to the pattern of your iris that’s on file. Futuristic sounding, sure, but iris-scanning is actually an establishe­d biometric technology. It’s akin to Touch ID, in the sense that the system takes an image of your iris and then converts it into a mathematic­al model that it stores. Then, when you try to use the system, it compares that model with what it’s seeing.

Unlike its close cousin, retinal scanning, iris scanning can be done with technology that’s easy to build into a phone – in fact, a few smartphone­s already feature iris-scanning capability using nearinfrar­ed LEDs, including the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL and the doomed Samsung Galaxy Note7. The technology allows users to unlock a device simply by looking at it. It can even work seamlessly with glasses, contact lenses, and some sunglasses.

So it’s absolutely plausible that Apple could integrate a similar feature into a new iPhone. There are some challenges to overcome: for example, few iris scanning technologi­es currently on the market do any sort of live-tissue verificati­on, meaning that it’s possible they could be defeated using highqualit­y images or videos. And given the ubiquity of high-resolution cameras in smartphone­s and elsewhere, pictures of your eyes are arguably much easier to acquire than your fingerprin­ts.

Facial recognitio­n

In theory, facial recognitio­n is even easier to implement than iris scanning, since all it requires is a traditiona­l camera and your face. However, the method Apple is rumoured to be implementi­ng is said to be ‘3D laser scanning’ hardware. That technology encompasse­s a variety of different approaches, none of which seem to currently be available in consumer products.

This report was buoyed in particular by the fact that earlier this year Apple snapped up Israeli firm RealFace, which specialize­s in facial recognitio­n.

Several smartphone­s and apps offer facial recognitio­n via a standard camera. The problem with those solutions is they’re often not particular­ly difficult to defeat, especially using video.

The rumour suggests that this laser-scanning technology could be used for augmented reality applicatio­ns, but to us it all seems a bit thin. A facial recognitio­n system could be more robust under conditions in which Touch ID doesn’t work all that well, but given the time and money that Apple has invested in promulgati­ng Touch ID, it seems less likely that the company would ditch it in favour of a new, untested technology.

The rumour cycle

Apple rumours tend to follow a pattern. Many start out expecting or pushing something revolution­ary, but the reality, when it appears, ends up being more pedestrian. So we’re sceptical about rumours of new biometric features. It’s possible Apple will roll out these new technologi­es, but we’d guess that they’re farther away than the rumours suggest.

Plus, adding infrared LEDs and laser scanners would increase the iPhone’s power consumptio­n and add to its cost.

That said, there are some compelling arguments for more biometric security. Iris scanning or facial recognitio­n, especially if integrated alongside fingerprin­t recognitio­n, could provide additional options to those who don’t want to, or more importantl­y, can’t use Touch ID, due to personal preference or accessibil­ity challenges.

But hopefully the smoke of these rumours points to some sort of fire that Apple is at least interested in pushing the bounds of security technology. Our devices are the gateway to much our personal and private informatio­n, and protecting them is of the utmost importance.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia