Kentish Gazette Canterbury & District

How our MPS

-

The votes that each of us will cast on June 23 will determine the future of Britain, of Europe and very possibly of the civilised world for many generation­s to come. Let us be clear about that.

There are no second bites at this cherry.

There will be no second referendum following a renegotiat­ion, no second thoughts, no turning back.

A vote Out will mean out and the government will embark upon the process immediatel­y.

If, therefore, we are to pause for thought and to commit our heads as well as our hearts then we need to do it within the next seven days. Afterwards will be too late.

My record indicates that historical­ly I have been, and remain, a Euroscepti­c.

I have always supported the principles of free trade enshrined in a common market,

I do not, and never will, subscribe to the concepts of “ever closer union” or of a United States of Europe and I believe that I am in harmony with the views of very many, if not all, of those I represent.

By the same token I have heard absolutely nothing, during weeks of campaignin­g, that persuades me that Britain will be more secure, physically or economical­ly, were we to leave the European Union.

Even the belief that we would somehow be better able to control immigratio­n, the dogwhistle issue of the desperate, is founded upon largely flawed arguments.

There is a real danger in the Back to the Future search for some rose-tinted bye-gone age of the 1950s and 1960s that did not, ever, exist except in minds wallowing in selective nostalgia.

The danger is that, in the search for some unattainab­le utopia, we abandon the very real and tangible economic and security advantages that we at present benefit from and that we then spend a generation or more seeking to re-invent trade and security agreements on worse terms than those that we previously enjoyed. As someone rather wiser than I has said “they want a revolution but there is no indication as to what Britain would look like one day, one month, one year or one decade later”.

There are, in fact, clues. When the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Governor of the Bank of England, the Head of the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund, the President of the United States of America, those who have run businesses like Sainsbury’s, Marks and Spencer, and B&Q, the vicechance­llors of our leading universiti­es, the London School of Economics, the Institute of Fiscal Studies, health service executives and many others whose opinions are informed tell us that a vote to leave will lead to recession, job losses, a decline in real incomes, loss of inward investment and a weakened health service then ought we not to hear alarm bells ringing?

And when the Home Secretary, Theresa May, the Foreign Secretary, Philip Hammond and the Defence Secretary Michael Fallon, all of whom are Euroscepti­cs but all of whom have access to MI5 and MI6 intelligen­ce not available to the rest of us, in tandem with experience­d chiefs of our armed forces and of NATO, all say that our defence and security will, at a time of great internatio­nal danger, be weakened if we leave the European Union. then ought we not to listen?

I have just one vote on June 23.

It is not my future that I shall be voting for but the futures of my three children and my five grandchild­ren.

I want my family to be secure and prosperous and that is why I shall be voting for Britain, as a proud, great and independen­t nation, to remain within, and seek to improve and reform still further, the European Union.

 ??  ?? Sir Roger Gale supports the principles of free trade, while remaining opposed to the concept of ‘ever closer union’
Sir Roger Gale supports the principles of free trade, while remaining opposed to the concept of ‘ever closer union’
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom