Kentish Gazette Canterbury & District

Campaigner­s set up fund in bid to halt huge developmen­t

‘It was felt the planning committee had completely ignored the wellargued points put by some 20 speakers

- By Gerry Warren gwarren@thekmgroup.co.uk @Gerry_warren

A fighting fund is being set up by furious residents to challenge the approval of Canterbury’s biggest ever housing developmen­t.

They accuse the city council of “completely ignoring” their arguments and are calling on chief executive Colin Carmichael to explain the “limited” public involvemen­t in the 4,000-home Mountfield Park applicatio­n.

The scheme on farmland south of Canterbury was approved by the planning committee last month despite protests from more than 20 residents’ groups and parish councils.

However, at a public meeting in Friends’ Meeting House in the city last week, objectors said the council should be made aware of the extent of the anger felt by the community at the way the decision was taken.

They believe there may be grounds for a judicial review of the decision or for an appeal to the Secretary of State to recall the applicatio­n for a public inquiry, with a fund set up to pay legal fees.

The campaign meeting was chaired by Clive Church, of the Alliance of Canterbury Residents’ Associatio­n. Afterwards, he said: “It was felt the planning committee had completely ignored the well-argued points put by some 20 speakers from various bodies criticisin­g many aspects of the proposals.

“Indeed, it seemed as if councillor­s had already made up their minds on the issue and council officers had failed either to secure promised gains or to negotiate any improvemen­ts in the proposals.

“Hence, the developmen­t may damage Canterbury’s World Heritage Site while the resulting increase in traffic will lead to further worsening in air quality.”

Campaign members will also be pressing for measures to tackle what they believe could be some of the worst effects of the developmen­t, including traffic congestion and the impact the mass housing will have on key views of the Cathedral and city from the surroundin­g hills.

Mr Church added: “We want to know what steps the council will take to genuinely consult with local people and community groups on future details of the developmen­t as they emerge.”

Canterbury City Council refutes the comments and has urged critics to accept the planning decision and not pursue legal action, which it would have to oppose using taxpayers’ money.

Spokesman Rob Davies added: “In recognisin­g that this was the largest planning applicatio­n Canterbury has ever received, we carried out extensive public consultati­on and significan­tly increased the public speaking rights at the committee meeting.

“When taking the decision, councillor­s had before them a very comprehens­ive report that dealt with all the issues, and heard a wide variety of views both for and against.

“A thorough debate followed, and while we appreciate that some people did not like or agree with the outcome, it was a decision that was reached at the end of a rigorous and proper process.”

What do you think? Email kentishgaz­ette@thekmgroup. co.uk or write to Gazette House, 5-8 Boorman Way, Wraik Hill, Whitstable, CT5 3SE

 ??  ?? An artist’s impression of the developmen­t on farmland south of Canterbury
An artist’s impression of the developmen­t on farmland south of Canterbury

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom