Kentish Gazette Canterbury & District

We must be tough to get the best deal

-

The moaning, the social media memes and misery that followed Theresa May’s long-awaited Brexit speech among my largely left/liberal-leaning friends were a sight to behold. As a Remain voter, I wanted to empathise with them. I found, largely, that I didn’t.

I followed the Troika’s negotiatio­ns with a nigh-bankrupt Greece very closely. The “union” in Europe disappeare­d faster than you could say “nein” when German banks were faced with having to take a haircut on their irresponsi­bly extended loans.

European Commission negotiator­s played ferocious hardball with Greece. Greece, meanwhile, continues to face youth unemployme­nt on a par with the Palestinia­n territorie­s. So much for solidarity.

Theresa May suggested that “no deal is better than a bad deal”. Advocating complete exit from not just the common market but the customs union sounds like a kick in the solar plexus for all our exporters; I understand the despair.

But as a negotiatin­g starting point, it’s a decent place to be. If we are not going to reverse the referendum decision (something that I, for all the myriad flaws in the referendum, think would be political poison) then it needs to be negotiated hard, using all the UK’S financial and security assets to make sure that we get a decent deal that secures open trade with Europe. Greece had just one card in its negotiatio­ns: “We’ll leave the European Union.” We’ve already done that. And we still hold a few more.

Like my friends I am concerned about weakening of environmen­tal and labour standards as we line up to secure free trade deals with countries aware of our need. Yet the UK already has a terrible track record in Europe: advocating for bee-killing pesticides, against tighter air pollution regulation­s, against a financial transactio­n tax. We now have a chance to look some of the more short-sighted policies of our own government right in the eye.

Another thought: Concern over free movement should not be a concern solely of the right. I despise Theresa May’s backwards, blinkered attitude on everything from foreign students (a great and welcome contributi­on to our economy and culture) to the right of British citizens to marry foreign nationals even if they are not earning above a certain arbitrary threshold. In recent months the Home Office has been threatenin­g to deport German neuroscien­tists, has deported an American scholar of Shakespear­e and many more. It’s disgusting.

Yet you can be liberal on immigratio­n and still oppose unmitigate­d free movement in Europe. Here’s Professor Ha Joon Chang, author of the critically acclaimed 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism; a favourite of many left-leaning voters.

“Wages in rich countries are determined more by immigratio­n control than anything else, including any minimum wage legislatio­n. The ‘free’ labour market […] if left alone, will end up replacing 80–90 per cent of native workers with cheaper, and often more productive, immigrants... the living standards of the huge majority of people in rich countries critically depend on the existence of the most draconian control over their labour markets – immigratio­n control.”

The European project has been, despite many of its incalculab­le flaws, one of powerful good. The vision of an end to the kind of tribalism that characteri­sed Europe before both of the world wars is one that should be supported. And I would vote Remain again in a heartbeat. But the EU’S failure to temper some of its dogma on free movement, in the face of more legitimate concern than many on the left appreciate, may yet result in precisely the kind of populist nationalis­m it was set up in no small part to counter. To quote Lao Tzu: “Yield and overcome; bend and be straight; empty and be full.” Britain as a powerful voice at the heart of Europe would have been my choice. But let’s remain great neighbours – even if that means playing a little hardball first.

‘ If we are not going to reverse the referendum decision (which, for all its myriad flaws, would be political poison) then it needs to be negotiated hard’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom