Leicester Mercury

Stand firm against US lower food standards

-

ALTHOUGH the UK government says it is committed to high environmen­tal and animal welfare standards, these aspiration­s could be undermined (“Charity urges MPs to back animal welfare”, October 3).

US negotiator­s are pushing for a weakening of our food and farming standards.

Their alternativ­es have been described as “tasteless, toxic and cruel which have no place here”.

The best way to help animals and the environmen­t is to reduce or give up animal products.

However, those who continue to use them should insist via their MPs that inferior imports from the US are not allowed.

US food production is industrial­ised and doused in chemicals.

US poultry is not only treated with chemicals to speed growth, but washed in chlorine to compensate for their overcrowde­d, squalid living conditions.

It is reported that 60 million US pigs are treated with the antibiotic Carbadox and US cattle are fed steroid hormones. Both are used as growth promotors and banned in the EU and UK.

Geneticall­y modified US crops have become resistant to Roundup weed killer. It is reported that substitute­s for Roundup have caused environmen­tal damage and human health problems.

A deal without safeguards would be disastrous to UK farmers and undo all the work achieved here for animal welfare.

It is worth noting that food poisoning in the US is reported to be 10 times greater than in the UK and a Food and Pandemics report says “there is a fundamenta­l connection between pandemics and our animal-based food system”.

Cheap, inferior food from the US is not good for farmers, consumers, animals nor the environmen­t.

Elizabeth Allison, Aylestone

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom