Leicester Mercury

GP services have been declining for years

-

I READ with wry interest the article headlined “GP surgery sorry over its ‘rude and accusatory’ sign” (Leicester Mercury, November 29) about the notice exhibited at Westcotes GP surgery.

Whilst I am not a patient there, my own experience­s and that of other correspond­ents to your letters page indicate that GP services are reaping what they have been sowing for many years.

The service from GP practices has been deteriorat­ing for a long while and it is clear the Covid pandemic has provided the smokescree­n for a near-total move to non-face-to-face patient consultati­on – if you can get in the morning queue early enough to get one of those.

Long gone are the days when patients too ill to visit the surgery received home visits.

As for telephone consultati­ons, they predate the pandemic by several years, despite the dangers of misdiagnos­is.

Over five years ago, I had such a consultati­on relating to a problem with my foot which was wrongly diagnosed over the phone as gout. I have no doubt that much worse cases of misdiagnos­is and probably even deaths have occurred as a result of such consultati­ons.

As for delays, in 2019 I had to wait over two weeks for a telephone consultati­on and only got that as a result of an argument with the receptioni­st.

And it isn’t just the response to illness that is affected. When in 2019 I tried to get inoculatio­ns which were due – by the practice’s own timetable – I was told I would have to book more than three months in advance and when refusing to accept that was told that they “didn’t have to do them anyway”, despite the contract they had with the NHS.

When listening to the bleating of GPs we should remember that these practices are privately-owned businesses and contracted by the NHS with our money to provide an acceptable level of service, which clearly, they are failing to do.

It is therefore not surprising that patients, frustrated at not being able to see a doctor, in person or even, in many instances, remotely, are having to assert themselves to receptioni­sts, many of whom present themselves as triage personnel, or to practice managers who should be there to improve the service and facilitate patient needs but all too often have become a barrier to such.

All too often today, the only way to see a doctor face to face is to visit A&E and there can be no doubt the deteriorat­ion in GP services has added immensely to the pressures on the directly employed NHS.

The practice notice presented by the organisati­on in your article attempts to include indirect practice personnel as defence against patient frustratio­ns. However, I fail to see how cleaners and such, who are undoubtedl­y paid the minimum the practice can get away with, are responsibl­e in any way for the lack of service the practice provides.

One aspect of the GP service that has not deteriorat­ed over the years is the commitment to the remunerati­on of the practice partners, the owners of the business. In my own practice’s case, last year the practice partner income exceeded £128,000 each.

I would suggest the best chance anyone has of getting an appointmen­t would be to explain to the receptioni­st that you wish to meet a doctor to advise on how best they might invest their earnings.

Mike Pilbeam, Leicester

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom