Macclesfield Express

It’s time to consign back-billing to history

-

AS many as 2.1 million households could have been hit by large, late bills in the past year because energy suppliers initially undercharg­ed them, Citizens Advice reveals.

The consumer champion is exposing the extent of back-billing – when energy firms send a revised bill after undercharg­ing – which can arrive unexpected­ly, and for hundreds of pounds.

Research found as many as 2.1 million people could have received a back-bill in the last year.

The average back-bill was for £206 – with 15 per cent of those who had been back-billed saying they were charged more than £250.

But people contacting the Citizens Advice service have reported much larger bills.

One person who asked for help was billed out of the blue for £1,120 – the supplier had only sent them estimated bills, had never read the meter over a five-year period and later demanded full repayment.

We have also helped a blind man who set up a monthly direct debit because he could not take meter readings – three years later he received a back-bill demanding £3,500 after the supplier said the monthly payment had been an underestim­ate.

Back-billing happens when customers have been undercharg­ed for their energy for a period of time.

It can be because a customer did not pay a bill, but often it is due to supplier mistakes, like underestim­ating bills or not investigat­ing a technical fault.

Suppliers can currently back-bill a customer for up to 12 months worth of gas or electricit­y, even when it was the firm’s fault.

But customers can be back-billed for even longer periods if the supplier argues the customer was at fault.

Billing errors are the number one energy problem people contact Citizens Advice’s consumer service about, with 16,000 cases last year.

Smart meters – which will digitally send regular meter readings to energy suppliers – will be introduced later this year and offered to every home by 2020. Citizens Advice backs the roll-out and says it should ensure bills are more accurate.

There is an opportunit­y to reduce the impact of back-billing and we call on Ofgem to either radically reduce the length of time that consumers can be back-billed or prohibit the practice entirely.

Customers shouldn’t have to pay the price for their suppliers’ mistakes.

Energy bills are already high so it adds insult to injury when companies go back to customers looking for more money after they got it wrong.

Particular­ly for suppliers who insist on payment in full, this can be a huge burden on already stretched finances.

Smart meters provide a perfect opportunit­y to consign back-billing to the history books.

As they are rolled out across the country Ofgem should ensure suppliers reduce the length of time they can back-bill customers. l IF you are affected by the above and require further help, contact your local CAB.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom