Macclesfield Express

Scrapping Cup replays shows lack of respect

- BY JONATHAN BLACKBURN

CHESHIRE’S football clubs have slammed the Football Associatio­n’s decision to scrap replays in the FA Cup. The county’s only Football League club, Crewe Alexandra, said the “self-serving” decision “demonstrat­es a total lack of respect for the Football Pyramid and our supporters.”

Macclesfie­ld FC said the club “wholeheart­edly condemns” the FA’s decision. “The Emirates FA Cup is the most magical competitio­n in the world and in our view, to impose this decision devalues it and disrespect­s all those teams that enter,” the club said in a statement.

Macclesfie­ld FC’s statement continued: “In addition, it is illuminati­ng that this decision was made without anyone other than the FA and Premier League being consulted. We appeal to the FA and Premier League to retract this decision and hold meaningful discussion­s with all those impacted, not just those in the top tier.”

Chester FC said the club was “dismayed” and that the decision “demonstrat­es an alarming lack of respect for the wider game” as the club’s board called for the establishm­ent of an independen­t football regulator.

The Football Associatio­n said fixture congestion and “wanting to maintain player welfare” were among the reasons behind the decision to scrap replays, which clubs across Cheshire have said provide access to muchneeded revenue, as well as ‘cherished experience­s’.

The Football Associatio­n added the number of FA Cup matches that will be broadcast in the early rounds will be increased next season. Chairman of National League North club Warrington Town, Toby Macormac, told CheshireLi­ve the decision was “very disappoint­ing”.

“It’s around the expansion of fixtures for the top six clubs, who have got squads more than big enough to cope with Warrington

Town away on a Tuesday night in an FA Cup replay if we were ever to get that far,” said Mr Macormac, who was chairman during Warrington Town’s improbable run to the FA Cup second round in 2014.

He added: “It’s further compounded by the money from live TV and the prize money being half of what they were ten years ago, when we had an amazing, club-changing run in the FA Cup. Not only are we now operating off a 50 per cent lower figure, you’ve now got the fact that there’s only one game to play.

“If the draw isn’t kind, say we did reach the second round and drew Plymouth away, for instance, it would cost us a fortune to get there, and we wouldn’t recoup any of that in a replay,” said Mr Macormac. CheshireLi­ve understand­s clubs have already committed to the competitio­n for next season after applying in February.

“A decision has been made, it’s poor, but I think clubs will end up getting on with it,” said Mr Macormac. “I don’t see clubs pulling out of the FA Cup unless someone wants to take a real stand.”

In a statement, Crewe Alexandra said: “While potential changes to the FA Cup format have been part of a much wider discussion­s regarding a ‘New Deal for Football’ between the Premier League, The FA and the EFL, there was no warning of this bipartisan measure that has been handed down.

“We are wholly unaware of any separate communicat­ion or consultati­on with Football League clubs like ours, who hold this historic competitio­n in such high regard. However, the manner in which this self-serving decision has been taken comes as no surprise.

“That is a great shame and demonstrat­es a total lack of respect for the Football Pyramid and our supporters. The FA Cup not only represents a key source of income for clubs throughout the Football

Pyramid, it creates cherished experience­s and lifelong memories for everybody connected to the game.

“The potential of an FA Cup replay is a crucial part of what makes this unique and beloved competitio­n so thrilling for the 700plus clubs who participat­e each year. Football belongs to all of us.

“Crewe Alexandra urges The FA and the Premier League to reconsider in order to ensure that fair and proper consultati­on process takes place.”

Similarly, Chester FC’s board said this morning it was “dismayed” by the decision, made “without considerat­ion of the consequenc­es their actions will have on clubs such as ours.”

The club statement reads: “The scrapping of replays from the first round proper onwards denies clubs access to much-needed revenue from gate receipts and broadcast fees, but also means supporters and players will have far fewer opportunit­ies to create the unforgetta­ble memories for which the competitio­n is so revered.

“It is deeply concerning that these changes have been announced without consulting the 144 clubs who make up the English Football League and National League, nor the hundreds across the football

pyramid who enter the FA Cup each season. This demonstrat­es an alarming lack of respect for the wider game and its fans, and reinforces the urgent need for a strong Independen­t Football Regulator.

“We urge The FA and the Premier League to listen to the concerns of clubs and supporters, suspend the changes and commence a full and proper consultati­on with all stakeholde­rs.”

In a statement released today, the Football Associatio­n said: “We have listened to the concerns expressed over the last 24 hours, and would like to outline the approval process which was undertaken for the 2024-25 profession­al game football calendar. We have been discussing the calendar for the 2024-25 season with the Premier League and EFL for well over a year.

“Removing Emirates FA Cup replays was discussed in the early meetings and all parties accepted that they could not continue. The discussion­s then focused on how to make all of our competitio­ns stronger, despite having fewer dates available and wanting to maintain player welfare.

“The changes to the Emirates FA Cup achieve this by returning it to a weekend competitio­n on

every round, and ensuring that we have exclusive broadcast slots in an increasing­ly congested calendar. To clarify, we have also increased the number of Emirates FA Cup matches that will be broadcast in the early rounds, which will lead to additional guaranteed broadcast revenue for EFL and National League teams.

“Additional­ly, we review the prize money annually for the competitio­n, together with representa­tives from the EFL and Premier League and will do the same for the 2024-25 season. The calendar for next season was approved last month by the Profession­al Game Board, which consists of four EFL representa­tives and four Premier League representa­tives and then by the FA Board, which includes Premier League, EFL, National Game and grassroots representa­tion.

“This is the process we undergo every year to approve the calendar. We understand the concerns expressed over the last 24 hours, and we will be sharing more details with clubs very shortly to explain the additional revenue opportunit­ies in the early rounds.

“We will keep this under review as the new calendar begins to ensure that EFL and National League clubs do not lose out.”

 ?? Phil Jones/sportseyep­hoto.com ?? ●●Macclesfie­ld players celebrate their FA Cup victory against Warrington Rylands earlier this season
Phil Jones/sportseyep­hoto.com ●●Macclesfie­ld players celebrate their FA Cup victory against Warrington Rylands earlier this season

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom