Maidenhead Advertiser

Criticism of ‘pigeon coop’ blocks of flats

Maidenhead: But 139-home project will go ahead if criteria are met

- By George Roberts georger@baylismedi­a.co.uk @GeorgeR_BM

‘Pigeon coop’ blocks of flats up to 10 storeys high may soon be coming to Maidenhead after councillor­s granted planning permission subject to conditions last week.

On Wednesday, November 18, members of the Royal Borough Developmen­t Management­Panel discussed plans to build 139 flats in five blocks, one of which would be 10 storeys, which would be built in place of the vacant office buildings Moorbridge Court and Liberty House, in Moorbridge Road.

After lengthy debate, a motion to reject the plans failed. Instead, council

lors voted to ‘defer and delegate’ the decision to the borough’s head of planning, which will be granted once certain conditions are met.

The plans, which were submitted by developer Bellway Homes, came in for heavy criticism.

Cllr David Hilton (Con, Ascot and Sunninghil­l) said: "This is described as a gateway developmen­t, these developmen­ts are always big, always in your face and not necessaril­y that attractive.

“I wonder if the applicant is being a bit greedy in seeking 129 dwellings at 258 dwellings per hectare.

“This is quite eyewaterin­g, and something I have not seen in the past.”

Cllr Geoff Hill (TBF, Oldfield), was in agreement with Cllr Hilton. He said: “It's certainly a site that should be developed for housing, I don’t regret the loss of the office space, some of that office space has been out for rent for eight, nine, 10 years.

“It’s just like a sort of pigeon coop. As many as you can squeeze in as hard as you can squeeze them.

“We have five towers here to keep the height down, but that consumes amenity space and runs the parking down.”

The plans include five affordable homes, a mix of social and affordable rented accommodat­ion, as well as 66 car parking spaces, including 26 electric vehicle charging points.

Cllr Joshua Reynolds (Lib Dem, Furze Platt) took a different viewpoint to his fellow panel members.

He said: “I am quite conflicted by this developmen­t. I think the affordable housing set out is a possible advancemen­t on the zero that were originally proposed by the developer, and that affordable housing being in its own block is a positive thing.

“I think we need to look at this in the round, knowing that the offices could be converted into flats tomorrow.

“Just as it is, we wouldn’t have any of the affordable housing and it would just be a big ugly office block, I don’t think that is any better than what’s being proposed.

“I think I might argue what we have here is better than that.”

A proposal to refuse the plans was put forward by Cllr Hilton, but did not garner enough votes. A vote to defer and delegate the decision to head of planning was then successful.

This means that the panel has authorised the head of planning to grant planning permission, subject to the completion of a satisfacto­ry legal agreement, securing onsite affordable housing, a contributi­on towards future maintenanc­e of landscapin­g, a contributi­on towards refuse collection services and a travel plan.

 ??  ?? Moorbridge Court could be replaced by high-rise blocks. Ref:133176-6
Moorbridge Court could be replaced by high-rise blocks. Ref:133176-6

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom