Maidenhead Advertiser

Council refuses battery plans

Little Marlow: Controvers­ial storage unit rejected

- By Adrian Williams adrianw@baylismedi­a.co.uk @AdrianW_BM

Buckingham­shire Council has refused a planning applicatio­n for a large electricit­y storage unit on greenbelt land in Marlow.

The developmen­t would have consisted of five buildings including two battery containers in Little Marlow Lakes Country Park, off Coldmoorho­lme Lane. The containers were to be about 45ft long.

Applicant Envirotech Energy Solutions had speculated that the batteries could support energy supply, providing back-up at times of lower availabili­ty of variable renewable sources.

“This contributi­on is needed to foster the ongoing developmen­t of renewable energy and to meet peak demand requiremen­ts,” the company wrote.

The applicatio­n, which was put forward in December last year, garnered controvers­y quickly, fetching objections from scores of residents, Little Marlow Parish council

and Beaconsfie­ld MP Joy Morrissey.

All were concerned about the impact of such ‘extremely visible’ structures on the greenbelt.

Envirotech Energy Solutions made a case for very special circumstan­ces, saying: “(To) store surplus energy in batteries and release it when needed to support wind and solar – and ultimately cut down carbon emissions – clearly has a great deal of merit.”

However, in a planning meeting held earlier this month, the council voted to refuse permission, on the grounds of inappropri­ate developmen­t of the greenbelt. This includes ‘a reduction in openness’ and a harmful impact on the Little Marlow Lakes Country Park.

Buckingham­shire Council added: “The proposal fails to provide for environmen­tal benefits, thus failing to contribute to the continued developmen­t and long-term management of the Country Park.”

Sam Kershaw, chairman of the Coldmoorho­lme Residents' Associatio­n, one of the objectors, said he is ‘delighted’ that Buckingham­shire Council has refused this applicatio­n.

“There is no need for a battery system in this area and its contributi­on to Britain's transition to renewable energy is insignific­ant,” he said.

“There is simply no justificat­ion for harming the greenbelt and Little Marlow Lakes Country Park for the sake of a commercial enterprise that would offer no local benefits whatsoever.”

Envirotech Energy Solutions did not respond to a request for comment.

 ?? ?? The site of the proposed electricit­y storage unit. Ref: 133362-3
The site of the proposed electricit­y storage unit. Ref: 133362-3

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom