Maidenhead Advertiser

Councillor ‘muted’ in Battlemead row

Maidenhead: Feelings run high at scrutiny panel meeting

- By Shay Bottomley shayb@baylismedi­a.co.uk @ShayB_BM

A councillor was ‘muted’ during a debate regarding the decision to approve a path across Battlemead Common’s East Field at a communitie­s overview and scrutiny panel on Monday night.

The hybrid meeting saw panel members at York House scrutinise a cabinet decision to approve the path across the field, where Cllr Donna Stimson (Con, St Mary’s) and officers were questioned over the recent decision.

The meeting was required after five councillor­s, namely Cllrs John Baldwin, Mandy Brar, Karen Davies, Geoff Hill and Simon Werner, called in the decision taken at cabinet in September.

Planning regulation­s proved to be a contentiou­s issue throughout the evening, with Cllr Hill (TBF, Oldfield) highlighti­ng the requiremen­t for a planning applicatio­n in the emerging Borough Local Plan for any ‘change of use’.

“As early as 2019, an applicatio­n was made (19/00972/4) to change the use of agricultur­al land to assembly and leisure,” said Cllr Hill.

“However, it was withdrawn

and has never been resubmitte­d. This was the intention back in 2019, and, as the leader of the council has confirmed, the motivation for a second path directly through the East Field is, as least in part, recreation­al.”

He added that the path did not having planning permission and said that it would be a ‘horrendous act’ for the Borough to construct the path if it went against planning policy and the law.

Andrew Durrant, executive director of place at RBWM, said: “A path of this nature and screening or fencing would be considered permitted developmen­t, as far as I understand.

“I don’t believe that what is being proposed here would require any form of planning permission, but that might be something we defer to the planning authority on just to clarify.”

The absence of a definitive answer frustrated Cllr Hill when planning regulation­s were brought up later in the meeting.

During questionin­g to officers from panel members, Cllr Hill interrupte­d and said: “Andrew Durrant has just said he doesn’t know the answer to that question. You’ve got to stop and not proceed and let this path be built – we’ve got to see whether we need planning permission or not.

“The officers cannot say whether it does or does not need planning permission, so the answer needs to be found and that’s what you need to do before a decision is made.”

At this moment, monitoring officer Emma Duncan stepped in an attempt to restore order. Cllr Hill said he was not going to let the council ‘shove [the path] through’ before he was ‘muted’ by chairman of the panel Cllr John Bowden (Con, Eton & Castle).

After almost an hour’s questionin­g, predominan­tly by councillor­s Helen Price, and Catherine del Campo (Lib Dem, Furze Platt), the latter moved a motion to bring the decision to full council for debate.

Eventually a motion, proposed and seconded by Cllrs Greg Jones and Gurpreet Bhangra, to take no further action was passed 3-2 by the panel.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom