MCN

Litelok Core Moto £199 ‘Tough – but not ideal on the go’

-

Tested by Dan Sutherland on four bikes

I’m a full-time worrier and the thought of some toerag making off with my pride and joy in the middle of the night sends a shiver down my spine. To ease my troubled mind, I’ve tested countless chains and disc locks, from tiny pocket-sized devices to hefty chains that are a real workout to muscle around the garage.

The £199 Core is said to offer something in the middle, with Litelok claiming it to be up to 50% lighter than a convention­al chain, with the flexibilit­y to be portable.

It’s found a home on at least four bikes in our time together and can be yours in a choice of black, orange, or red – with the ability to clip them together for more length, should you need to.

Available in three standard sizes and scoring a Sold Secure Gold award for theft protection, it’s a simple case of unlocking the central clasp and threading it through the front or rear wheel. The keys are particular­ly small and can go missing easily in a cluttered garage, so be careful if you’re clumsy like me.

The lock is fitted with a washable outer neoprene skin, which has never moved round over the fastener during use – something that can happen with traditiona­l covered chains. It’s a good job that outer fabric is washable too, as it loves nothing more than collecting black splodges of grease from the back wheel.

Greasy gunk aside, I can’t fault the spec and I have confidence in the product when I use it. The trouble is – despite the name – it’s not that light and the rigidity of the lock makes it very difficult to carry with you on the go.

Even the smallest size is 2.45kg and I have now reverted to just using it at home, as I cannot get it to fit in a rucksack on the go. Litelok say it will fit in a topbox, but if you’re like me and don’t use one, it becomes a bit of a one-trick pony.

Quality Value www.litelok.com

1

year

ON TEST

 ?? ?? Simple to use and the mechanism works well
Simple to use and the mechanism works well
 ?? ?? Rugged but more hefty than lite…
Rugged but more hefty than lite…
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom