Nottingham Post

Are government­s in breach of their laws?

-

JOHN Flynn’s letter (“Continuing problems of unadopted roads.” Opinion, March 15) demonstrat­ed how Mr Flynn applied independen­t thought to a problem that can only worsen.

His letter reminded me of a 1970s government survey incorporat­ing every local authority in England (I’m sure it didn’t include Wales). The survey encapsulat­ed the physical condition of some 800.000 miles of roads throughout the nation, whereby all officialdo­m involved had agreed to neglect some 300.000 miles. The controvers­y was to maintain just 500.000 miles of roads!

Miles of roads in large counties like Lincolnshi­re, Norfolk, Yorkshire, would be at the mercy of the elements. At that time an, outcry was expected, but there was not one word of public dissention.

Just think of the billions of pounds government­s have handled since road fund licensing was introduced in 1920. During 1939, the coalition government voted that road taxation should be spent funding the war effort. Considerin­g the national plight, it was fair.

After the war successive government­s lacked a plausible excuse for spending road fund monies to suit their political ambitions. Strangely enough, the 1920 Act enabling vehicle road taxation was never repealed. Since 1920 masses of statute legislatio­n has been introduced covering motor vehicle taxation, but politician­s in their infinite wisdom left the original Act live, putting government­s in breach of their own legislatio­n.

Readers are aware that untaxed motor vehicles are removed from public roads. However, neither a motoring organisati­on nor a charity has litigated against any government for not spending vehicle taxation revenue on road networks. This synopsis is a reason why rural roads particular­ly are in an appalling state! It also offers a classic example of motorists being used as cash cows!

Nigel J Starbuck

Bingham

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom