Perthshire Advertiser

Protect our most vulnerable from fire

-

Dear Editor While it is too early to apportion responsibi­lity, in light of the latest disastrous fire at Grenfell Tower, which by all accounts could have been avoided – it does seem that informed opinion at this early stage does lay part blame at the lack of sprinkler systems being installed.

Perhaps now is the time to revisit the regulation­s, particular­ly here in Scotland, and not only for high-rise flats.

The legislatio­n on sprinklers in Scotland is that they are for the protection of the building asset.

The Scottish Government, on October 1, 2013, acquiesced and facilitate­d the watering down and weakening of fire regulation­s in the Building (Scotland) Act 2003 and mandatory changes made in 2010.

Basically, the Scottish Government and all political parties seem to support the inadequate legislatio­n that the most important part of installing sprinklers is for the protection of the building asset.

Oversight by central government was delegated down to local authoritie­s either to save central government the bother of administra­tion and to save costs or to enhance the power of the local authoritie­s.

New-built nursery buildings/school extensions of 1000 square metres – which could accommodat­e approximat­ely 150 children – were advised that there potentiall­y was no necessity on the grounds of financial cost to even consider installing sprinkler systems.

Freedom of Informatio­n showed that whilst this alone could seem reprehensi­ble to most people, what was more disturbing was that the costings on which the decision was facilitate­d were highly suspect.

Now, in the light of the shocking West London catastroph­e – and hopeful wakening up of authoritie­s generally – there is seemingly to be a second look at fire regulation­s in Scotland.

Nurseries should be included, children are surely not second class citizens.

Legislatio­n is in place for the protection of the building asset, which was, and seemingly still is the priority, and any death or injury down to collateral damage – which I am sure would be of great comfort to any grieving parent. Gordon Dye Crieff By email

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom