Perthshire Advertiser

Noble ideas

- Paul Cargill

A society set up to remember a 17th century nobleman has revived its plea to have a battlefiel­d west of Perth preserved.

The 1st Marquis of Montrose Society reckons the area where the Battle of Tippermuir was fought could even become a tourist attraction. Councillor­s will be put under pressure next week to accept a new local developmen­t plan which if adopted will allow prospectiv­e developers to build thousands more homes west of Perth.

The full council will meet to consider the proposed LDP2 again this coming Wednesday and members will be urged to approve the submission of the land use strategy document to Scottish Ministers for examinatio­n on the day or risk the “final adoption” of the plan slipping as much as 16 months.

Despite the council receiving nearly 750 representa­tions during the most recent consultati­on on the revised plan raising all sorts of complaints about its current provisions

councillor­s will be warned any “notifiable modificati­ons” they might want to make to it now could push the document’s ratificati­on as far back as late 2020.

In a report recommendi­ng the council approve the proposed LDP2, which includes a revised allocation for the so-called “wider” Perth West site where developers want to build as many as 3738 new homes, the council’s strategy and policy manager Peter Marshall says any delay in submitting it to ministers could see its adoption delayed until October that year.

“It should be noted that in the event of notifiable modificati­ons, the target date for the adoption of the LDP will slip from July 2019 to April 2020 at the earliest,” he writes.

“This revised date would only be achieved if the Directorat­e of Planning and Environmen­tal Appeals (DPEA) can deliver within its six month target.

“Indication­s are that there is a high risk this may not be possible if the council does not submit in September, due to the number of other plans being submitted for examinatio­n around the same time.

“This could lead to a further six month delay to final adoption in October 2020.”

His recommenda­tion to approve the proposed plan including the “wider” Perth West allocation, which allows for between 2392 and 3738 homes instead of just 550 as well land for a medical centre, two “double-stream” primaries and a cemetery, comes despite the developers behind the contentiou­s Almond Valley Village proposal claiming it will create an “oversupply of housing land in Greater Perth”.

The Pilkington Trust warned in a representa­tion filed during the last consultati­on on the proposed LDP2 that such an overprovis­ion could overwhelm existing infrastruc­ture and went on to recommend restrictin­g the Perth West allocation to just 550 houses.

“There are several large sites in and around Perth which are in the process of, and will therefore have commenced investment in, bringing forward first phases of developmen­t,” said Alastair Wood of Savills on the Pilkington Trust’s behalf.

“These include Almond Valley Village, adjacent to Perth West, and allocated for a 7001100 house neighbourh­ood with a new school, and Bertha Park, for 3000 houses and 25 [hectares] of employment land.

“Oudenarde at Bridge of Earn is allocated for 1300 houses, Scone North for 700, Luncarty South for 300, Broxden for 300, and Errol for 240.

“An overprovis­ion of major strategic housing sites has the effect of potentiall­y flooding the

Provost Melloy with Mr and Mrs Culliven market and driving down land prices to a level where land will no longer be released which will not benefit any parties - neither existing and future residents, developers or the council.”

The trust’s representa­ion concluded: “There is no need to add the extensive area of an extended Perth West to the housing designatio­ns in LDP for Greater Perth.

“The MU70 [Perth West] designatio­n should remain as per the adopted LDP with a ‘long term’ designatio­n over the extended area.

“This will allow an extended Perth West developmen­t to be brought forward ... only when it is needed for Greater Perth’s housing land supply.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Joyous
Joyous

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom