Perthshire Advertiser

PKC payment policy ‘lawful’

Council defends position

- Paul Cargill

Perth and Kinross Council has insisted its policy of collecting cash from developers to pay for infrastruc­ture upgrades is lawful after concerns were raised during a consultati­on.

In a representa­tion sent to the local authority while it was consulting on its next proposed local developmen­t plan Stewart Milne Homes questioned whether PKC’s developer contributi­ons policy was valid in light of a landmark Supreme Court ruling last year.

Lord Hodge ruled both Aberdeensh­ire and Aberdeen City Council had acted unlawfully when they asked Elsick Developmen­t Company to pay £7.5 million for a new bridge over the River Dee as a condition of planning approval for a 4000 home developmen­t near Stonehaven as it was nowhere near where the new crossing was planned.

Stewart Milne raised concerns regarding PKC’s policy with regards to the Cross Tay Link Road. Its representa­tion read: “There is a concern that the levels of developer contributi­ons emerging [through] policy and supplement­ary guidance are unreasonab­le, resulting in many developmen­ts becoming unviable.

“Any requiremen­ts for developer contributi­ons must take account of available capacity within the existing infrastruc­ture network and must not be used where there is no direct link within the developmen­t or if it is too remote to be considered reasonable.”

And it continued: “Developers should not fund large-scale infrastruc­ture projects to enable developmen­t to come forward and make up shortfalls in the local authority budget.

“A fair mechanism of delivery considered on a site by site basis is needed to ensure that developmen­t viability is not at risk as a result.

“This should be assessed and demonstrat­ed through the local developmen­t plan and not left for supplement­ary guidance or until an applicatio­n is made for planning permission.

“It is therefore questioned whether PKC’s supplement­ary guidance on developer contributi­ons and affordable housing, specifical­ly...in relation to transport infrastruc­ture is valid.

“This includes the Cross Tay Link Road which requires funding of £88 million from developmen­ts in the area identified in ... the guidance.

“The validity of pooled infrastruc­ture contributi­ons is even more critical after the Supreme Court’s decision that Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Developmen­t Planning Authority’s strategic transport fund is unlawful.”

However a council spokespers­on said: “I can confirm that we are aware of the judgement by the Supreme Court issued in October last year. Developer contributi­ons are used for capital projects only and for infrastruc­ture upgrades related to the planned developmen­t.

“We reviewed the council’s policy in relation to developer contributi­ons following the decision. Our policy is materially different and we are satisfied that it is lawful.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom