Perthshire Advertiser

Mental health team cleared by SPSO

- PAUL CARGILL

Complaint handlers have found claims local health profession­als failed to treat a patient reporting problems with their mental health appropriat­ely to be unfounded.

The patient told the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) they felt they were not properly assessed by a community mental health team run by the Perth and Kinross Health and Social Care Partnershi­p and received substandar­d support from staff.

The patient also claimed staff acted unreasonab­ly when they removed them from a waiting list for dialectica­l behaviour therapy (DBT) - a kind of cognitive behaviour therapy used to change negative thinking and encourage positive behavioura­l changes.

However, the SPSO has since concluded the partnershi­p and its staff acted reasonably throughout the patient’s treatment and decided not to uphold a single one complaint after examining the case in detail.

The ombudsman’s decision report, which refers to the patient only as C, said:“C complained about the treatment and support provided by a community mental health team run by the partnershi­p.

“C said that they were not reasonably assessed by appropriat­e clinicians and that the partnershi­p failed to provide them with a reasonable diagnosis or treatment.

“C said that their care was mainly provided by a community mental health nurse whom C did not consider to be appropriat­ely positioned to offer diagnosis or treatment. In addition, C considered that it was unreasonab­le that they were removed from the list while they awaited an appointmen­t for dialectica­l behaviour therapy (DBT).

“We took independen­t advice from an appropriat­ely qualified adviser. C’s first complaint related to their diagnosis. While there was a time management issue relating to one of the appointmen­ts, the partnershi­p’s actions in relation to providing a diagnosis for C was reasonable and in a reasonable timescale. As such, we did not uphold this complaint.

“C’s second complaint related to the treatment they received. While there was a communicat­ion issue in relation to a referral for C, overall the treatment provided by the partnershi­p was reasonable. We did not uphold this complaint.

“C’s final complaint related to the support the partnershi­p provided to them. We found that the support provided was reasonable while they were being seen by a community mental health nurse. C had also been provided with access to a helpline while they awaited further therapy treatment.

“As such we did not uphold this complaint.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom