Practical Classics (UK)

Thoughts on new penalties for speeding?

-

Another money making exercise! It would not be so bad if they put all the money into fixing the roads – and better safety measures. Mark Vinall

A tiered system does have some merits – insofar that somebody who has strayed to 75mph perhaps unintentio­nally on a motorway should not be punished as severely as the guy who always drives at 110mph and doesn’t fear the consequenc­es. I would fully expect and accept a substantia­l penalty for driving in excess of 100mph, as I would have knowingly and quite wilfully broken the law. Adrian Holness If you don’t speed, then you’ll be fine, not fined. So a cyclist can run red lights and knock into pedestrian­s, but motorists go 1mph over limit and are fined! Just 1 or 2mph over isn’t worth the paperwork! Neil Johnson

One of the results of the change is that you no longer have a 10 per cent leeway (previously legal), due to any inflation in the tyre due to changing atmospheri­c conditions. If you are recorded over the speed limit, yet your speedomete­r in the car says you are at the limit, it will be deemed you and your cars fault. Tony Moxon

A limit is an upper limit not a lower one or even a minimum target. Carping on about a tolerance is like saying it’s not murder if you kill someone with one bullet - but use three bullets and it is. You can’t kill someone just a little bit – just like you can’t speed just a little bit! You speed or you don’t. Glen Jones

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom