Rail (UK)

NR does well on safety - but performanc­e is a concern

- Andrew Roden Contributi­ng Writer rail@bauermedia.co.uk

THE Office of Rail and Road (ORR) says Network Rail (NR) has provided “good leadership” on safety - but overspends on renewals and enhancemen­ts are putting pressure on its borrowing facility with the Government.

The analysis is contained in the ORR’s latest Network Rail Monitor covering October 18 to March 31 for England and Wales (Scotland is covered in a separate publicatio­n - see pages 10-11). It shows that in 2015-16 there were no industry-caused workforce or passenger deaths on NR infrastruc­ture.

“Network Rail should also take credit for the leadership it has shown during the year in pushing forward the first industry-wide health and safety strategy, launched in April 2016,” says the ORR.

NR met its 2015-16 year-end targets for reduction in train accident risk and workforce lost time injuries. However, other safety initiative­s such as Business Critical Rules and Planning and Delivering Safe Work have not gained the traction needed, the ORR concludes.

It adds that NR “does not yet have a consistent­ly reliable and predictabl­e safety management system, calling into question the sustainabi­lity of its improved recent safety performanc­e”.

Risks associated with earthworks are said to have increased compared with 2014-15, and management of risk of track geometry defects is reckoned to be “more dependent than it should be on the knowledge competence and expertise of individual staff”.

On performanc­e, although the ORR acknowledg­es that NR began Control Period 5 at a lower level of performanc­e than anticipate­d, and that it has delivered most of the milestones in its improvemen­t plan, “performanc­e has not returned to targeted levels”. It says that while some issues such as traincrew and fleet delays are outside its direct control, NR has acknowledg­ed that performanc­e has not met the expectatio­ns of the industry.

The Public Performanc­e Measure Moving Annual Average in England and Wales was 88.9% at the end of 2015-16 (0.7 percentage points

below target), while the figure for Cancellati­ons and Significan­t Lateness was 3.1% (0.2 percentage points worse than target). The ORR acknowledg­es that it is very difficult to give a definitive answer on the impact on performanc­e of major projects such as Thameslink, but says it is “yet to see convincing analysis” to calculate the impact of passenger growth on performanc­e.

NR has performed well in terms of asset reliabilit­y, and is well above target with all areas improving except for earthworks and telecoms. But even though NR has deferred £677 million of capital spending into future years, it still spent £386m more than budgeted on renewals - 13% more than budgeted.

NR plans to defer some future renewals work to Control Periods 6 and 7 (2019-24 and 202429), which it believes will have a “limited long run impact” on sustainabi­lity. However, the ORR argues that in the short term deferrals will increase the whole life cost of the railway due to additional maintenanc­e that may be required as a result. It also suggests there is a risk of asset performanc­e deteriorat­ing.

In terms of network enhancemen­ts, the ORR says that its revised project dates following the Hendy Review in March 2016 are more achievable.

On the Great Western Main Line (one of the most challengin­g of NR’s projects), the ORR says NR is achieving better productivi­ty rates, but that a key test of its ability to deliver to the revised dates will be the commission­ing of the first electrifie­d section of the route in September 2016.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom