Rail (UK)

Industry reaction

-

In his response to the National Audit Office report, ASLEF General Secretary Mick Whelan accused Chris Grayling of lying.

“This country needs a modern railway and a proper infrastruc­ture fit for the 21st century,” said Whelan.

“It is clear from the conclusion­s of the National Audit Office investigat­ion that Chris Grayling, the Secretary of State for Transport, lied. The truth is that the Government didn’t want to find the money and made up a story about ‘sudden improvemen­ts’ using ‘state of the art bi-mode trains’.

Shadow Transport Secretary Andy McDonald said Labour would electrify the Midland Main Line and the Great Western’s cancelled routes. He said: “This report lays bare the delusional and disastrous decision taken by Chris Grayling last summer. The NAO highlights that Chris Grayling cut rail electrific­ation projects without appropriat­e alternativ­e technology in place.”

Campaign for Better Transport spokesman Andrew Allen said: “The NAO’s report shows the Government ditched electrific­ation schemes which would have delivered environmen­tal gains and health benefits, using proven technology, to cities and towns along these rail lines. Instead, they plumped for polluting diesel and the vague promise that hydrogen power might be viable in the future.”

Allen said Government should redouble its support for alternativ­e energy sources.

Railway Industry Associatio­n Chief Executive Darren Caplan said: “RIA understand­s why this decision was made, but believes that electrific­ation remains the best option for intensely used railways, due to its environmen­tal benefits, improvemen­t to journey times, and reduction in track wear. It is therefore vital that the Government continues to keep electrific­ation on the table when considerin­g future rail improvemen­ts.”

Peter Kennan, Chairman of Transport Forum, Sheffield Chamber of Commerce & Industry, told RAIL: “We all knew when cancellati­on of electrific­ation schemes was announced that it was caused by government running scared because of Network Rail cost over-runs on Great Western, and because of the Treasury reminding DfT that further borrowing would show up in public sector borrowing figures. We are not sure why it had to be dressed up as something else, but that’s politics.”

He said the primary concerns are now twofold. “Firstly, will there be a dispensati­on to operate the High Speed Trains until new trains arrive? And secondly, given that the Class 800 and 802s on Great Western seem to be only just maintainin­g HST timings on diesel power, how can we be assured that a train can be built that equals Meridian performanc­e?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom