Some searches never end

Having contributed the article on Edith Nesbit’s The Railway Children ( RAIL 845), I was interested to read the response from Craig Wright ( RAIL 849).

Mr Wright argues that Strines should be considered the inspiration for Nesbit’s much-loved children’s book, with other possible candidates left to ‘eat their hearts out’.

Unfortunately, I fear that Mr Wright has let his enthusiasm run away with him a tad, and has fallen into the familiar trap of selective use of the facts. I have come across this often - writers use the facts that support their case, while disregarding ones that do not. Biographers of Richard III and those purporting to have solved the Whitechapel murders often fall into the same mire.

The bottom line is that Nesbit didn’t inform us, so her true inspirations are lost in time’s mists. The evidence (such as it is) must be largely circumstantial.

I am happy, therefore, that my analysis of The Railway Children and the inspirations behind it bears scrutiny, as I did consider all the known options - including Strines. I mentioned Strines in several places, and even conceded I should go up there to continue my search.

It is good to have a debate about the origins of The Railway

Children. I will always respect another person’s views, and hope that I might be accorded the same respect in return. Ultimately, this subject will come down to opinion.

Since Mr Wright’s riposte was published I have received several letters from readers who preferred my analysis. I am sure Mr Wright’s version will also have its devotees. Steve Roberts, Christchurch