Rail (UK)

Something to say? This is your platform.

- Ben Jones, Lincolnshi­re

It’s been fascinatin­g to read various articles recently about reopening schemes for closed and mothballed railways around the country.

A ‘bigger’ railway is a worthy cause and deserves as much support as we can give it. However, if we’re to really get more people out of their cars and onto public transport, reducing congestion in and around our cities, supporters of rail have to show more imaginatio­n in what we’re asking for.

It seems that many reopening proposals are founded (at least in part) on nostalgia for lines that look very attractive in old photograph­s, but which might not necessaril­y be the answer to our national or regional transport needs.

I’m not denigratin­g the efforts of campaign groups, which should be applauded for their dedication and persistenc­e over the years (or even decades), but with the advent of city regions, ‘metro mayors’ and regional transport bodies we should be looking at the more urgent issue of decongesti­ng our towns and cities, while simultaneo­usly reducing air pollution.

For that, we need more ambitious and more imaginativ­e schemes to take the railway closer to major traffic generators - airports, hospitals, universiti­es, city centres, industrial and retail parks - and link them more effectivel­y to where people live, as well as integratin­g them with our local buses, regional and national rail networks.

In many towns and cities, railway stations are hampered by their distance from these key traffic sources, extending journey times and often making rail less convenient than other modes. Rather than expecting people to flock to the railway, we need to make it the easiest option for as many journeys as possible - be it for work, learning, health or leisure.

As anyone who lives in the East or West Midlands or around the big cities of the North knows, road congestion is strangling productivi­ty, soaking up our valuable time in traffic jams and on too-slow roads and railways unsuited to modern-day travel patterns.

There is no single solution to this - every city and region will require a different strategy. But if there is to be a more equal balance between the economies of London and the Regions, we need to be serious about investing in vastly better urban public transport.

This could mean tram-train, undergroun­d metro systems or European-style S-Bahn/RER heavy rail networks, or more likely a combinatio­n of all three, supported by a fully integrated bus network, cycling and walking routes.

Studies of the most productive and ‘liveable’ cities across the world always highlight those with the best - and densest - public transport networks, such as Hong Kong, Zurich, Vienna and Singapore… and London.

Transport for Wales appears to be on the right lines with its proposals for the new Wales & Borders franchise, and I look forward to seeing its plans unfold over the next few years.

There are some very worthy candidates for reopening across the country, and regional and national authoritie­s should be pursuing the reopening of old lines wherever it is beneficial. But let’s not inhibit the massive potential for growth by restrictin­g ourselves to the network inherited from the Victorians.

 ?? PAUL BIGLAND. ?? The first Sheffield tram-train (399201) approaches Sheffield Midland during a test run on April 7. Investing in new urban public transport such as tram-trains, as part of enhanced integratio­n with major traffic generators, could be more productive than seeking rail reopenings that may not satisfy public requiremen­ts.
PAUL BIGLAND. The first Sheffield tram-train (399201) approaches Sheffield Midland during a test run on April 7. Investing in new urban public transport such as tram-trains, as part of enhanced integratio­n with major traffic generators, could be more productive than seeking rail reopenings that may not satisfy public requiremen­ts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom