Rochdale Observer

Slaughter of the moles continues to this day . . .

-

I TRIED to imagine a picture I saw recently was taken during the reign of Queen Victoria.

However, the line of dead moles hanging on a fence, was, in fact, taken last week.

Known as a ‘gamekeeper­s gibbet’ this outdated practice was used to show landowners that their minions were doing a good job, incredibly, some thought that other moles would see their chums strung up and clear off fast.

A classic example of the misguided and downright ignorance of some Victorian molecatche­rs and their bosses, moles can hardly see!

Rather than tell you exactly where it is, and by the way there were thirty moles strung out in a long line, I will once again raise my eyes to the heavens and wonder whether we will ever see the back of this grim throwback. Truth is, I don’t suppose we ever will, because there will always be some who refuse to move on and embrace REAL conservati­on.

Read this by Professor Tim Birkhead of Sheffield University, part of his review of Roger Lovegrove’s ‘Silent Fields’.

“The deliberate killing of vermin to preserve game for hunting started in the 1500s with the introducti­on of bounty payments. The figures make chilling reading, not least because they give us a feel for the abundance of certain species in previous times. For example, during the 17th Century at Wirksworth in the Peak District bounties were paid on a total of 1,775 raven heads over just 18 years. Lovegrove estimates that the total number of house sparrows killed deliberate­ly between 1700 and 1930 was no fewer than 100 million. As recently as 1980, bounties were still being paid on bullfinche­s.

“Bounties were hardly an efficient means of eradicatio­n, for the hunters had a vested interest in not destroying their source of income. In the past century there was a bounty on grey squirrel tails, until in 1958 it was discovered that hunters were simply cutting off the tails to claim their shilling and releasing the squirrels so they would produce more tails.

“Bounty-hunting was also ineffectiv­e because it was most popular (and lucrative) when the species were most abundant. With the exception of the introduced coypu, bounty-hunting did not work; and once persecutio­n ceased, numbers bounced back.

“In the Middle Ages it was generally believed that God had given us animals to do with as we pleased, and this included eliminatin­g those that interfered with farming, hunting or any other human activity.

“Attitudes to wildlife were harsh to say the least - bull-baiting, badger-baiting and cock-fighting were commonplac­e.”

Both authors would be mortified to discover that, although not as widespread, the abuse continues, and as much as I would enjoy the opportunit­y to conclude on positive news, sad to say I cannot.

In recent years the Peak District has seen dead squirrels, complete with glue and netting, placed on top of stone walls to tempt passing goshawks, and the Peak has the dubious honour of every year appearing high up and sometimes ‘top’ in the hit parade of bird of prey persecutio­n.

Next week I promise good news.

 ?? RSPB ?? ●●Moles at work
RSPB ●●Moles at work

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom