Rochdale Observer

Care home staff shut in office as child went on rampage

- NICK STATHAM Local Democracy Service

CHILDREN’S home staff shut themselves in an office as a youngster ran amok in the premises. They called for additional support but this took 90 minutes to arrive, while the unsupervis­ed child continued to cause ‘extensive damage’. The disturbing incident has been reported by Ofsted following an inspection of the Rochdale home. l● FULL story on page seven

CHILDREN’S home staff shut themselves in an office as a youngster ran amok in the premises.

They called for additional support but this took 90 minutes to arrive, while the unsupervis­ed child continued to cause ‘extensive damage’.

The disturbing incident has been reported by Ofsted following an inspection of the Rochdale home.

The facility, which cannot be named for safeguardi­ng reasons, is run by a private firm.

It provides care and accommodat­ion for children with emotional and behavioura­l difficulti­es.

Ofsted found that ‘poor practice’ had resulted in a child being admitted without staff having ‘full knowledge’ of the risk they posed and their previous behaviour.

This had a ‘ significan­t and negative effect on children’s safety and welfare’.

The report states: “Risks of violence towards others and using weapons were not considered at the time of admission.

“As a result, decisionma­king about whether staff could safely meet the needs of the child was not well informed, and the effect on other children and staff at the home had not been considered.”

It notes that staff have frequently been the target of assaults, verbal abuse and intimidati­on - including the incident where employees ‘ remained in the office for a period of time because of the levels of intimidati­on shown by a child’.

The report adds: “This left the child unsupervis­ed and ongoing damage to the home unchecked.”

Staffing levels were not adequate to support the needs of the child, Ofsted said.

However, during last month’s visit, the provider took ‘immediate steps’ to increase staffing ratios at the home.

Inspectors also found that risk management plans regarding the use and storage of hazardous materials were weak.

In one example, a child was able to get into an unlocked shed where paints were stored - these were then used to damage the home.

Ofsted said the environmen­t was of ‘poor quality’, ‘unclean’ and in significan­t need of repair and refurbishm­ent.

‘Continual incidents’ had resulted in damage to carpets, walls, fixtures and furniture’ officials said.

There is currently only one child living at the home. Ofsted has stopped it from taking on any more youngsters until staffing and care arrangemen­ts for them are stabilised.

The report adds: “Any further placements would place children at risk of harm.”

Significan­t improvemen­ts to the home environmen­t must also be made.

A spokespers­on for the home has responded to the findings.

They said: “We are naturally disappoint­ed with Ofsted’s findings of our good rated home as we factually disagree with many points in the report which we have raised with them. We appreciate that Ofsted’s role is to safeguard young people which is aligned with the ethos of [the provider].

“Ofsted’s action to temporaril­y pause any additional admissions in this home, mirrored the action already taken by [the provider].

‘Risks of violence towards others were not considered’

PLANNING applicatio­ns lodged with Rochdale Borough Council up to the week ending March 19 include: ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a singlestor­ey rear extension, at 26 Camberley Drive, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for the erection of a three-storey building comprising of 15 apartments, at land adjacent to Trub Road, Castleton. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for the erection of three two-storey dwelling houses, at land at 4 Gipsy Lane, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a two-storey side extension and part single-storey/part two-storey rear extension with rear dormer, including removal of the chimney and existing single-storey rear extension, at 24 Lynton Avenue, Rochdale. ●● DETAILS have been submitted to comply with conditions involving CMP, SI, surface water drainage, and foundation engineerin­g measures, in relation to a previously submitted applicatio­n at Higher Stakehill Farm, Stakehill Lane, Middleton. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a two-storey rear extension, at 4 Gipsy Lane, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a singlestor­ey front, side and rear extension, following the demolition of the existing porch, car port and conservato­ry, including an extension of the existing front and rear dormers, at 1 Bowden Close, Rochdale.

●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a certificat­e of lawfulness for a proposed rear dormer extension, at 20 Copenhagen Street, Rochdale. ●● DETAILS have been submitted to comply with a condition involving landscapin­g, in relation to a previously submitted applicatio­n at 7 Falinge Fold, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a first floor extension above the existing detached garage to provide additional living accommodat­ion, at Syke Farm, Ringlows Lane, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a certificat­e of lawfulness for the proposed use of the premises as supported living accommodat­ion for four adults with learning difficulti­es, and two non-residentia­l carers, at 4 Kingsway, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a singlestor­ey rear and side extension, following the demolition of the existing single-storey rear extension, at 23 Dale View, Littleboro­ugh. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for an outdoor seating area with the installati­on of a powder coated aluminium veranda structure with a glazed roof, and one internally illuminate­d fascia sign to depict ‘Crust Local Pizza’ brand, at 21A Rochdale Riverside, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a certificat­e of lawfulness for a front porch, at 18 Arundel Street, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a two-storey side extension following the demolition of the outbuildin­g, at 37 Sycamore Avenue, Milnrow. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for tree works, involving the crown thinning of a horse chestnut tree, at 8 Bentgate Close, Milnrow. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for an extension to the existing agricultur­al building, at Higher White Slack Farm, Huddersfie­ld Road, Milnrow. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for prior approval for a singlestor­ey extension measuring 5.5m from the rear of the original dwelling, with a maximum height of 3.98m and a height to the eaves of 2.45m, at 36 Woodlands Road, Milnrow. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a singlestor­ey rear extension, providing a link through to the existing outbuildin­g, front and rear dormer extension, following the demolition of the existing front and rear dormer extensions, at 50 Woodlands Road, Milnrow. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for two side dormer extensions, at 23 Thames Road, Milnrow. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for tree works, involving the crown thinning of a horse chestnut tree, at Paradise House, Eden Cottage, Moor Hill, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for the erection of a 225sqm building for storage of agricultur­al machinery, at the existing agricultur­al yard located on 3 hectare agricultur­al holding to the west of Over Town Lane, Norden. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for the erection of a new detached dwelling, following the demolition of the existing dwelling, at Higher Moorgate Farm, Gristlehur­st Lane, Heywood. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for prior notificati­on for the change of use from agricultur­al into flexible use, at Castle Hill Farm, Castle Hill Road, Heywood. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a first floor side extension, singlestor­ey rear extension, and the conversion of the garage into additional living accommodat­ion, including alteration to the front elevation, at 35 Woodhouse Lane, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for prior notificati­on for a singlestor­ey extension measuring 6.75m from the rear of the original dwelling, with a maximum height of 4m, and a height to the eaves of 2.57m, at 39 Weythorne Drive, Heywood. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a rear dormer extension, and the installati­on of rooflights on the front elevation, at 55 Elm Park Gate, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a proposed roof conversion, including a dormer to the rear of the property, and rooflights to the front elevations, at 31 Holmes Street, Sparthbott­oms & College Bank, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for prior notificati­on for a singlestor­ey rear extension, measuring 5m from the rear of the original dwelling, with a maximum height of 3.8m and a height to the eaves of 2.7m, at 14 Verdun Crescent, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for the erection of a new storage building, at the site of HSS Hire Group Plc, Tell Street, Rochdale. ●● AN applicatio­n has been submitted for a replacemen­t dormer extension and part first floor/part two-storey side extension, along with alteration­s to the front porch and fenestrati­on on the rear elevation, at 44 Laburnum Way, Littleboro­ugh.

 ??  ?? l
l
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom