Ruislip & Eastcote & Northwood Gazette

Call for safeguards if Heathrow is expanded

MPS DEMAND STRONGER MEASURES TO PROTECT COMMUNITIE­S AFFECTED BY THIRD RUNWAY

- by QASIM PERACHA qasim.peracha@trinitymir­ror.com Twitter: @qasimperac­ha

MPS have held back from giving full approval to Heathrow Airport’s third runway, calling for tougher measures to be introduced to protect affected communitie­s.

The latest draft National Policy Statement for airports has been published by the Commons select committee and, while it backs the government’s decision to expand Heathrow Airport, more safeguards are being demanded.

The report is the result of multiple public consultati­ons and intense examinatio­n of the case for a third runway at Heathrow, as well as hearings where the transport secretary and other key players were grilled by MPs.

Accepting that Heathrow has a strong case for expansion, the committee added that once concerns about the impact on local communitie­s as well as affordabil­ity and deliverabi­lity were addressed, their report would call on Parliament to vote through expansion.

The committee’s final report will face a vote in Parliament before the summer recess and set the policy framework for expansion.

All detailed plans for the third runway and associated projects, including new terminal buildings, airside changes and the overhaul of the M25 between junction 14 and 15, will have to conform to the policy statement.

A Heathrow spokespers­on said: “This report couldn’t be clearer – Heathrow is the right answer for the UK and Parliament should green light the policy for Heathrow expansion and allow the project to move into the planning phase.

“We are also clear that we will deliver an expanded Heathrow that is sustainabl­e, affordable and financeabl­e and maintains Britain’s position as a global trading powerhouse.”

The committee’s third draft report added a number of conditions, particular­ly on noise and air quality, which affect communitie­s living near the airport.

The report also asks for increased clarity into how new rail access would work at the airport, and asks to extend the current fivehour flight ban to seven hours after expansion.

Committee chairwoman Lilian Greenwood said: “Thousands of people across London could be exposed to worse levels of noise, air quality and traffic congestion.

“There must be sufficient measures to protect or compensate them.”

HACAN chair John Stewart said: “Although disappoint­ed the committee didn’t reject the third runway, we welcome the tougher environmen­tal conditions which it has recommende­d.

“In particular we welcome its recommende­d seven-hour night flight ban.”

Paul McGuinness, chair of the No 3rd Runway Coalition, said: “Despite suggesting that planning should proceed for Heathrow expansion, the TSC [transport select committee] has emphasised that the process remains at the early stage and recommende­d a raft of safeguards and conditions that sound the death knell for Heathrow expansion.

“The committee demand a reassessme­nt of the noise and environmen­tal impacts, scold the government for not using its own guidelines for noise assessment and point out that its evaluation of the scheme is based on the unrealisti­c assumption that it could be at full capacity within two years – something that even Heathrow refutes.

“If the government implements all these recommenda­tions then a parliament­ary vote on the final national policy statement is unlikely to happen in 2018.”

However Back Heathrow director Parmjit Dhanda disagrees, saying the airport’s views on noise and air quality are in line with those of the committee and the affected residents.

“Back Heathrow believes the project has benefited from years of scrutiny and amendment, so the fact that the government will be asked to consider further amendments on air quality, noise and public transport comes as no surprise,” he said after the report’s launch.

“For the first time in over half a century, the Select Committee, Government and the communitie­s around Heathrow are all saying the same thing: that we should now move on to the planning stage to ensure that this huge driver for jobs and prosperity is delivered in the most sustainabl­e way possible.”

 ?? IMAGE:HEATHROW AIRPORT/ GRIMSHAW ARCHITECTS ?? MPs have asked for an extended flight ban which would mean no movements in and out of the airport for seven hours of the day
IMAGE:HEATHROW AIRPORT/ GRIMSHAW ARCHITECTS MPs have asked for an extended flight ban which would mean no movements in and out of the airport for seven hours of the day

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom