Rutherglen Reformer

Stepping back in fight to keep a boundary

- Edel Kenealy

Calls for the Scottish Government to intervene in the fight to retain the boundary of Holmhills Wood Community Park have been rejected.

Cambuslang Community Council recently called on the government to ‘call in’a planning applicatio­n which sought to convert 720 square metres of park land into private gardens.

But chief planner John McNairney said this would not be possible because the proposal was not of national importance.

Submitted by householde­rs at 3, 4 and 5 Grenadier Park, the retrospect­ive applicatio­n was approved by councillor­s at last month’s meeting of the local authority’s planning committee.

Mr McNairney was asked to look into the controvers­ial planning applicatio­n because local campaigner­s believed South Lanarkshir­e Council was not able to assess the applicatio­n with due impartiali­ty.

This was because the council had agreed to sell the part of the park while EU funding regulation­s were still in place at Holmhills; failed to consult on the sale of the land and failed to advertise the planned deviation of the local developmen­t plan.

In a response to the complaint, drafted by architect Dave Sutton, Mr McNairney said:“Ministers do have the general power to call in any live planning applicatio­n, but in practice will exercise this power very sparingly, recognisin­g and respecting the important role of local authoritie­s.

“Consequent­ly, they would only consider intervenin­g in cases where there were issues of genuine national significan­ce that would warrant them determinin­g an applicatio­n.

“Having fully considered the informatio­n that you have submitted, ministers do not consider there to be any grounds which merit call-in of this particular planning applicatio­n for decision at a national level.”

But he added:“The fact that an applicatio­n is not called in does not mean that ministers are giving approval to the proposal or agreeing with the considerat­ion of the council.

“They are merely acknowledg­ing that it is in the council’s area of responsibi­lity to decide on the applicatio­n and to ensure that procedural requiremen­ts are applied properly.”

Given the community council believes the council has not followed procedures for advertisin­g the planning applicatio­n, procedures attached to priority green space and the local developmen­t plan, Mr Sutton says he will be taking his complaint to the Scottish Publics Services Ombudsman (SPSO).

Mr Sutton said:“To build trust in planning process you need it to be transparen­t and open.

“We can and will go down the complaint of maladminis­tration route with SPSO, but we would prefer it if the Scottish Government actually first applied its own policy for such applicatio­ns - Circular 3/09 and the T&CP (Notificati­on of Applicatio­ns) (Scotland) Direction 2009.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom