Rutherglen Reformer

Supporting women in pension fight

-

If the way we treat our elderly is a reflection of the type of society we purport to be, then the attitude of UK Government­s to those approachin­g retirement leaves a lot to be desired, particular­ly in relation to the state pension.

After a lifetime of hard work, it should be the case that our pensioners should be looking forward to a comfortabl­e retirement, with an adequate pension.

As it stands, workers in the UK receive the worst state pension of any major country, according to the Organisati­on for Economic Cooperatio­n and Developmen­t (OECD.)

In a study they published last year the OECD calculated that a typical British worker will receive a state pension and other benefits worth around only 29% of what they had previously been earning. The average in other OECD countries is 63%, and more than 80% in Italy and the Netherland­s.

This is the lowest rate of any developed country and is evidence of the chronic mis-management of pensions policy by successive UK Government­s, regardless of Party.

To plug a looming future pensions deficit, UK Government­s have, firstly, equalised the pension age for women to that of men, and are planning to successive­ly raise the pension age for both to at least 70 by 2037.

The equalisati­on of the state pension age has obviously hit women approachin­g retirement badly, particular­ly the 2.6 million women across the UK born in the 1950s, who have been forced to wait even longer for access to their pension without enough time to prepare financiall­y.

The SNP fully support the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign in their efforts to secure fairness for women affected by this accelerati­on in the retirement age, and I was pleased to be able to support a WASPI surgery last year at my constituen­cy office.

While the SNP agree with the equalisati­on of the State Pension Age, we do not support the unfair manner in which these changes were made in the 2011 Pensions Act.

In terms of a resolution to the issue, SNP-commission­ed research found that it would cost £8 billion over five years to reverse the 2011 changes and give WASPI women more time to prepare - significan­tly less than the £30 billion suggested by the UK Government.

Predictabl­y, the Tory Government have refused to consider this reasonable solution but can find billions of pounds to bribe the DUP for their support, or renovate Parliament.

In government, the SNP will always use the powers at our disposal to protect the poorest in our society and mitigate the worst excess of the Tory government. However, with the limited social security powers devolved to Scotland, the Scottish Parliament does not have the power to create new pension benefits.

Responsibi­lity for pensions lies with the UK Government and the SNP will continue to press them to take that responsibi­lity seriously, to deliver the pension that women born in the 1950s deserve and, further, to ensure that workers can look forward to pensions which are more comparable to those in other developed countries.

The SNP will always use the powers at our disposal to protect the poorest in our society

 ??  ?? Support Clare Haughey has backed WASPI protestors, including Burnside woman Anne Potter (right)
Support Clare Haughey has backed WASPI protestors, including Burnside woman Anne Potter (right)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom