Scottish Daily Mail

Held to ransom for £4.5m by the party boss he ignored

- extracted from Call Me Dave: the Unauthoris­ed Biography Of David Cameron, by Michael ashcroft and Isabel Oakeshott, published by Biteback Publishing on October 12 at £20. © Michael ashcroft and Isabel Oakeshott 2015. to order a copy, call 0808 272 0808 or

BY THE autumn of 2009, with the economy still reeling from the financial crisis and Labour in total disarray, exhausted and riven with plots against Gordon Brown, there was an overwhelmi­ng sense among voters that it was ‘time for change’.

At Westminste­r and in much of the media, it was received wisdom that the Tories would win the election next year.

Yet the intelligen­ce from the Conservati­ve Party’s private polling was worrying: Cameron had not (as his spin doctor Coulson liked to put it) ‘sealed the deal’.

Among those concerned about his attitude was Don Porter, a key figure on the party board and head of the umbrella group of Tory Party Associatio­n chairmen. After nearly four decades working for the voluntary wing of the party, Porter was tapped into the mood on the ground in constituen­cies the length and breadth of the country, and better placed than most to detect ominous signs.

An ultra-loyalist, sometimes he felt it was his duty to deliver difficult messages to the Prime Minister. His agenda was always to help the party leader succeed.

At the end of November 2009, he penned a frank memo to Cameron warning that the party was heading for a hung Parliament. He was particular­ly concerned about morale among activists. ‘The oxygen pipeline between volunteers and the parliament­ary party has been polluted . . . This saddens me greatly,’ he wrote. ‘Volunteers like strong, empathetic and clear leadership. Without this, they drift in all directions.’

Turning to policy, he argued that some initiative­s appeared inconsiste­nt with the overall vision, ‘while others appear to be a case of: don’t upset anyone’.

In a final broadside, he questioned whether the Shadow Cabinet had an appropriat­e balance of skills and talent. ‘Of course you have William [Hague], who is indispensa­ble,’ he wrote.

‘Eric [Pickles] reminds voters that not every member of the Shadow Cabinet comes from a privileged background or has millionair­e status. He also speaks with a genuine Northern accent, which is a real asset. Beyond that, we struggle to appear “normal”.’

It was a serious message that Cameron could not ignore. ‘Bloody good letter — thanks very much,’ he said gamely when they next bumped into each other. ‘ Thanks — we s hould get together,’ Porter replied. ‘Yes, we must,’ said Cameron. ‘When?’ Porter pressed. ‘Oooh, have a word with Ed [Llewellyn],’ the party leader replied, dashing out of the door.

Porter continued to press for a private meeting, but it never happened. Of the many concerns he had listed, it was Cameron’s perceived attitude to volunteers about which he was most troubled.

Raising some £28 million a year for the Conservati­ves, the voluntary wing is the backbone of the party, responsibl­e for selecting candidates and councillor­s, dropping leaflets and sticking up posters, liaising with local media, and generally keeping the party alive outside Westminste­r.

It had been cultivated assiduousl­y by previous party leaders, particular­ly Margaret Thatcher.

Porter says: ‘Thatcher would come to party conference every year and probably give up two- anda-half hours of her time, not just to meet the treasurers of the Associatio­n, but the people who were presenting a cheque to the party on behalf of their Associatio­n. She would personally receive them. She’d be on the platform and she orchestrat­ed the whole procedure: no matter how small the cheque, no matter how big the cheque, she made you feel the most important person in the party.’

Yet under Cameron, many volunteers felt they were a low priority. This was not all his fault: Porter believes those in charge of Cameron’s diary bear the heaviest responsibi­lity.

Either way, matters came to a head early in 2010, when Porter discovered that plans were afoot to axe the only salaried member of staff responsibl­e for liaising with volunteers.

Cameron was probably unaware of the proposal, but it confirmed Porter’s suspicions that some people around the leader did not care about the wider party. Furious, he got straight on the phone to [Conservati­ve Chairman] Caroline Spelman and threw down the gauntlet.

Porter recalls: ‘ She started talking about how the party had to save money. I said: “Caroline, let me tell you three things that I am going to do unless this job is reinstated.

‘ “First of all, I will call an emergency meeting of t he Convention, which includes every local party chairman in the country. They will all come to London — they will know that this is something important.

‘“I will offer my resignatio­n as national chairman and ask them to consider it. I will tell them the reasons why.

‘“Then I will ask every Associatio­n i n the country to stop sending money to the centre, until this job is reinstated. Third, I will ring up every Associatio­n in the country with loans at CCHQ — which was about £4.5 million — and tell them to withdraw it by Tuesday.”’

There was silence down the phone. Within hours, the job had been reinstated.

Volunteers felt they had become a low priority

 ??  ?? Ominous signs: Don Porter felt Cameron was too remote from local Tories
Ominous signs: Don Porter felt Cameron was too remote from local Tories
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom