Scottish Daily Mail

Universiti­es could win exemption from right to know law

- By Eleanor Harding Education Correspond­ent

uNIverSITI­eS could soon be exempt f rom t he F reedom o f I nformation Act under a second attack on the public’s right to know.

Ministers i n t he D epartment f or B usiness, Innovation and Skills are consulting o n w hether t o r emove u niversitie­s from the law, which obliges public bodies t o r espond t o r equests f or i nformation about their finances and how they operate.

The proposal is in a consultati­on document on education reform and comes on top o f a nother, h ugely c ontroversi­al, r eview of the Act ordered by the Cabinet office.

In response to this first review, vice- chancellor­s claimed universiti­es should be exempt from the Act because t hey a re p rivate i nstitution­s – n ot p ublic b odies – d espite receiving almost £4billion a year in taxpayers’ money.

But the News Media Associatio­n, w hich r epresents t he n ewspaper i ndustry, h as c riticised t he proposal, d escribing u niversitie­s as ‘precisely the kind of institutio­n that FoIwas intended torender accountabl­e’.

Lucy Gill, of the NMA, said: ‘universiti­es are powerful institutio­ns that exercise important public functions.

‘The educationa­l responsibi­lities of universiti­es are crucial to the future and standing of individual­s, generation­s and the entire nation.’

It comes after the Daily Mailused the Act to expose bumper cash d eals f or a n umber o f u niversity leaders. Last year the Mail’s Investigat­ions unit revealed how when he was vice-chancellor of Nottingham Trent university, Professor Neil Gorman pocketed £623,000 in one year, including £250,000 i n b onuses.

The highest pay deal for a university e mployee w as g iven t o a n unnamed oxford academic who pocketed £630,000 in a year – more than four times the Prime Minister’s salary. The Act has also b een u sed t o e xpose n umerous other public sector scandals as w ell a s w asteful s pending, b ut it is under threat from the Government, w ith m inisters c laiming it is ‘too costly’ to administer.

In December, the russell Group, which represents the 24 most prestigiou­s universiti­es including o xford a nd C ambridge, made a submission to the Cabinet office review claiming its members should be exempt.

Although most tuition fees are funded by government-administer­ed student loans, some of which will never be repaid in full, the g roup c laimed t his s hould n ot count a s p ublic m oney.

It s aid ‘ universiti­es a re n ot p ublic bodies’ and also complained that the cost of answering FoI queries was prohibitiv­ely high, with members spending £1.1million doing this in 2014, based on an e stimate o f £ 155 p er r equest.

universiti­es uK, which represents 132 vice-chancellor­s and principals, claimed its members spend £10million a year answering FoI requests. It stopped short of calling for a blanket exemption f rom t he A ct, b ut d id seek significan­t curbs.

A spokesman for the business department said: ‘The Higher education G reen P aper c onsultatio­n is not related to any other review on FoIs. The consultati­on seeks views on a huge range of issues t o h elp i nform t he G overnment’s h igher e ducation r eforms.

‘This i ncludes s eeking t houghts on measures to ease the regulatory burden on the sector.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom