Scottish Daily Mail

AA charged me £90 for call-out — even though I’m a member

- Money Mail’s letters page tackles all your financial headaches

MY CAR wouldn’t start late one evening in Bristol, so I called the AA, as I’m a member through Ford Assistance. However, the AA said I was no longer a member. I needed to get home, so reluctantl­y paid £89.29.

The following day, my garage confirmed I was a member. I have made numerous phone calls and sent many emails, but have now been told it may take up to eight weeks to investigat­e my complaint — and until then, I am not able to speak to a manager.

K. P., Caerphilly. The AA says the agent who handled the call made a mistake and it apologises for this. Further apologies are made for its failure to rectify the error by refunding the additional cover you bought and for the difficulti­es you had in getting your point across.

Apparently, you upgraded your daughter’s membership — as the best option in the circumstan­ces — but did not have authority over her account.

The eight-week timeframe is actually a regulatory requiremen­t. If the AA doesn’t take action by then, you can go directly to the Financial Ombudsman.

But most of the time, businesses take action much more quickly.

The AA has refunded your payment and sent a cheque for £50 by way of further apology. A spokesman says: ‘As always, this kind of event leads to internal training to help ensure that it doesn’t happen again.’ I RECENTLY came across an old Abbey National passbook for an account held jointly by my late parents, who died in 1994 and 1997. The last entry indicated a balance of £3,266 in September 1996.

Santander advised me there was no record of the account, which it claimed was closed in 1992. I pointed out the passbook clearly indicated transactio­ns between 1992 and September 1996.

I have now been advised that an advanced research team found evidence of the account up until 1998, but it contained only £228.

Neither of my parents’ deaths seemed to be registered against the account, which they would have been had I subsequent­ly withdrawn the funds.

As far as the bank is concerned, the account was closed. As the sole beneficiar­y of my father’s estate, I would have been the only person to whom this money would have been released.

M. L., West Sussex. ABBey National in the Nineties could be a chaotic operation. It made blunders in its mortgage department, and it would not be surprising if there were also blunders in the savings section.

The fact that it hadn’t registered your parents’ deaths may mean it failed to process any letters sent.

Santander now admits you were informed incorrectl­y that the account was closed in the 1992/93 tax year. Following this, you were told the account was closed on or around February 7, 1998, with a balance of £228.38.

After an extensive search of old reports, Santander now says the account was last reported to hMRC on that date, but the final balance is unknown. It has apologised and offered £100 as a gesture of goodwill for the first two errors and spoken to the relevant teams to ensure such a thing does not happen again.

you are understand­ably sceptical that you have received the correct answer this time. however, my guess is that you probably closed the account as part of the probate process. This can be a very stressful period and it is possible, over time, to forget every single transactio­n we undertake.

If you are still unhappy, you can, of course, take the issue to the Financial Ombudsman Service by calling 0800 023 4567. PLEASE help! I am trying to change energy supplier — do any websites make honest, like-for-like comparison­s?

On comparison websites, I enter all the data required (annual kWh usage/payment made) but, without exception, comparison­s are made between what I’d pay on the standard tariff and what their pet supplier will charge.

I suppose it’s too much to hope that a site out there will set out tariffs by listing cost per unit (kWh) and standing charge?

A. G., East Sussex. TheSe sites are making comparison­s with the standard tariff because that is what you will be on when you move. They are comparing the latest offers with what you will be paying, rather than what you have been.

you can actually dig deeper into the tariffs simply by clicking the ‘full details’ option on results. This should show exactly the informatio­n you are looking for.

Regulator Ofgem has a code of

practice for comparison sites and a list of accredited ones that are supposed to calculate costs in an unbiased way. These include uSwitch, Energyhelp­line.com and MoneySuper­Market.com

To avoid getting only those that pay commission, you need to untick a couple of boxes. For example, with uSwitch, untick the box that says: ‘email me news and money-saving deals.’

And when the results come up, there is a box on the left that says: ‘Include plans that require switching directly through the supplier.’ Tick this. On MoneySuper­Market.com, click the box that says: ‘There are other tariffs available that can save you an extra £X a month but we can’t switch you to them. Show widest range of tariffs*.’

Switch.which.co.uk defaults to showing you all tariffs, though you can opt to see only firms that have a customer score.

Others have similar options — you just need to look for them.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom