Scottish Daily Mail

Even Tiny Tim would have felt sorry for Scrooge Sturgeon...

- by Stephen Daisley

THE Ghost of Christmas Past takes many forms but none so cruel as Ruth Davidson. Nicola Sturgeon had one final First Minister’s Questions of 2017, an unkind year in which she asked Father Christmas for Indyref 2 but got a lump of coal in her stocking and Alex Salmond on Russia Today.

Any hope that she could get through her last parliament­ary grilling without being reminded of the year’s many low points faded with the appearance of Miss Davidson, rattling chains and loving every minute of it.

Cast your mind back, the Tory leader invited, to the distant days of 2016 when the First Minister, cornered on the classroom recruitmen­t crisis, pledged to hire additional teachers in priority subjects. Very commendabl­e it was too. So, how many specialist graduates had been despatched to the chalkface? None. They wish to be anonymous? No, they wish to be left alone by the Scottish Government’s recruiters. A year and a half on from the First Minister’s announceme­nt, her flagship programme had managed to sign up exactly no teachers. Zero. Zilch.

In fact, ministers were still in the process of setting up the scheme. Miss Sturgeon’s teacher recruitmen­t drive hadn’t even got on the road yet. It wasn’t a case of Goodbye, Mr Chips so much as Please Stay Another Term, Mr Chips, and Would You Mind Covering Double Physics Tomorrow.

Next, Miss Davidson turned to Christmas Present. A new framework for school inspection­s vowed by the First Minister was nowhere to be found. A guaranteed national action plan for training headteache­rs was conspicuou­s by its absence. Indeed, of the 75 education policies rolled out last year, a third had failed to materialis­e. By this point, even Tiny Tim would have felt sorry for Miss Sturgeon. Stop, spirit! Why do you torment the First Minister so?

Mostly because Ruth Davidson takes unseemly pleasure in haunting her opposite number with her own broken promises.

She disappeare­d into the crisp winter eve with a frosty parting shot: ‘Famously, the First Minister started this year again insisting that education would be her number one priority. At the end of the year, does she really think that it looks that way?’ Bah humbug.

A somewhat less unsettling apparition was Richard Leonard, the Ghost of Scottish Labour’s Future. He started with a strong question on Scottish Fiscal Commission forecasts which pointed to slow economic growth and lacklustre productivi­ty under the Nationalis­ts.

Things went awry when he tried to blame Nicola Sturgeon for every redundancy in Scotland this year, a rare charge against her that even I thought was a bit unfair.

Mind you, she didn’t help herself when she fired back: ‘The member should ask the workers at Dalzell, who would not be in a job right now without the interventi­on of this government. He should ask the workers at Ferguson’s shipyard, who would not be in a job right now. Or the workers of BiFab, who would not be in a job this Christmas without the interventi­on of this government.’

MISS Sturgeon had saved their jobs and they had better be in all the earlier the next morning to thank her. Still, Mr Leonard’s performanc­e was so windy and listless that her spurt of self-congratula­tion was forgivable.

She is a seasoned parliament­ary jouster and seemed sincerely offended by the Labour leader’s rambling. So she flattened him in one of her better turns this year. Perhaps I was carried away by the Christmas cheer but she had me fondly reminiscin­g about vintage Sturgeon.

Elsewhere, Nationalis­t backbenche­r Stuart McMillan stressed the need for Christmast­ime road damage to be repaired ‘timeously’ and Miss Sturgeon rushed to agree. Timeous is a quintessen­tially Holyrood word, ugly and redundant but Scottish and usefully obscure.

If you promise to do things ‘on time’ you can be held to that. If you undertake to deliver an outcome ‘timeously’, most folk are too busy checking the dictionary to notice you haven’t recruited one specialist graduate teacher in 18 months.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom