Scottish Daily Mail

May: Now let’s get on with it

She throws down gauntlet to EU with blueprint for successful Brexit

- By Jason Groves Political Editor

THERESA May threw down the gauntlet to Brussels yesterday as she said that the EU had a ‘shared interest’ in making a success of Brexit.

In a long-awaited speech, the Prime Minister set out a detailed blueprint for Brexit that would maintain trade links, while setting Britain free to decide its own destiny.

After Brussels accused her of ‘cherry picking’ the parts of EU membership it likes, Mrs May pointed out that all trade deals work that way.

And, with the clock ticking down to Britain’s exit in March next year, she urged the EU to accelerate trade talks.

She said: ‘We know what we want. We understand your principles. We have a shared interest in getting this right. So let’s get on with it.’

Yesterday’s speech at Mansion House in the City of London follows weeks of Cabinet wrangling over how far to go in making a clean break with the EU.

In a decisive statement, Mrs May said she would lead Britain out of the single market, rejected calls to join a customs union, called time on the jurisdicti­on of the European Court of Justice and vowed to end free movement of people.

The PM said Brexit would produce ‘a stronger, more cohesive nation’. And she dismissed calls for a second referendum, saying: ‘We won’t think again on Brexit. The people voted for it and it is incumbent on the Government to deliver it.’

But she also warned that making a clean break with Brussels would come at the price of reduced access to European markets. ‘I want to be straight with people – because the reality is that we all need to face up to some hard facts,’ said Mrs May.

‘We are leaving the single market. Life is going to be different. In certain ways, our access to each other’s markets will be less than it is now. How could the EU’s structure of rights and obligation­s be sustained, if the UK – or any country – were allowed to enjoy all the benefits without all of the obligation­s? So we need to strike a new balance.’

Last night, Mrs May’s interventi­on appeared to have succeeded in uniting the warring factions of the Conservati­ve Party without immediatel­y alienating Brussels.

In a speech that was long on detail, Mrs May: ÷Rejected ‘unacceptab­le’ EU plans to keep Northern Ireland in the customs union after Brexit, which she warned would break up Britain. ÷Said the UK may continue to respect EU state aid and competitio­n rules – a move that could frustrate a future hard-Left government bent on imposing socialism. ÷Pledged to maintain regulatory standards that are ‘as high as’ the EU’s, even if they are achieved by different means. ÷Warned that the European economy would lose out if it tried to punish the City. ÷Set out two options for maintainin­g light-touch customs arrangemen­t between Britain and the EU. ÷Confirmed she was willing to walk away without a deal if the EU tried to punish Britain.

She also said that Britain could pay to remain in EU regulatory bodies in areas such as chemicals, medicine and aerospace , promised to negotiate a deal on fishing that would give British trawlermen a ‘fairer allocation’ of fishing rights and said that Britain would demand ‘domestic flexibilit­y’ in areas like the emerging digital sector to prevent tech start-ups being held back by EU red tape.

On the critical balance between divergence from EU rules and access to the single market, Mrs May said she expected many regulation­s for traded goods to remain ‘substantia­lly similar’ in the immediate future.

But, critically, she said Parliament would be free to change them in future ‘in the knowledge that there may be consequenc­es for our market access’. She said disputes would be settled by an ‘independen­t mechanism’ – not EU judges.

Mrs May said she would not be knocked off course by hardliners on either side of the debate, saying she wanted the count.

In the run-up to yesterday’s speech, Euroscepti­c MPs were on red alert for any signs of backslidin­g.

But last night most were content that Mrs May had struck the right balance. Former Conservati­ve leader Iain Duncan Smith described the speech as ‘pretty good’.

And Tory ex-chancellor Lord Lamont said it was now time for diehard Remainers on the Tory benches to stop underminin­g Mrs May.

Sarah Wollaston, a leading Tory Remainer, described the speech as ‘pragmatic and positive’.

But diehard Remainer Anna Soubry struck a sour note, about Mrs May’s blueprint, saying: ‘It will not deliver the same benefits, the positives to our economy, as we currently have.’

The EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, last night welcomed the ‘clarity’ that Britain wanted a clean break, saying this would help Brussels finalise its negotiatin­g guidelines.

Comment – Page16

‘We need to face up to some hard facts’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom