Scottish Daily Mail

Meghan and a racy video she may want to forget

Racy video shot five years ago for men’s magazine emerges — and could scupper Kate court payout

- From Peter Allen in Paris and Rebecca English Royal Correspond­ent

PROVOCATIV­ELY unbuttonin­g her blouse, stripping off and leaning over a barbecue, this is Meghan Markle years before she ever dreamed that one day her prince would come.

The actress, then in the middle of a divorce from her first husband, flashed her cleavage and sucked a thumb as she took part in a racy assignment for a men’s magazine.

The Grilling Never Looked So Hot With Meghan Markle video, shot in July 2013, remains on YouTube despite her recent marriage to Prince Harry. It begins with Miss Markle, then 31, tossing her hair and unbuttonin­g her jacket and see-through shirt to reveal her bra.

Then, dressed in a skimpy top, new bra and hot pants, she grills a burger, posing suggestive­ly in a sequence that was subtitled ‘the ultimate guy’s girl’ by Men’s Health magazine. Of course, this was long before Meghan, now Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex, met Harry.

In the past she has often told of the sort of work she had to accept as a jobbing actress. While the royals understand and accept this, others, it seems, are only too keen to try to cash in on a potential source of embarrassm­ent.

French lawyers are said to be intending to use the barbecue video to challenge damages awarded to the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge over peeping-Tom photograph­s of Kate sunbathing topless. In what some are seeing as a deliberate attempt to humiliate the royal family, it is believed barristers may claim the racy images of the new Duchess of Sussex show the younger royals are happy for sexy pictures to be taken.

William and Kate were awarded £92,000 damages last year over the long-lens photos, taken in September 2012 while they relaxed at a Provence chateau owned by the Earl of Snowdon and published in French Closer magazine. They showed Kate wearing only bikini bottoms and having her suncream rubbed in by William.

However, at an appeal hearing in Versailles beginning today, it is thought barristers will argue that the Cambridges were not entitled to damages as other royals have taken part in photoshoot­s featuring ‘steamy body shots’ to promote themselves. They will cite several racy images of Meghan, including the Men’s Health video.

And they will claim that William and Kate received exaggerate­d compensati­on solely because they are royal, with payouts in routine French privacy cases often less than £100.

‘They are happy with sexy photos of themselves when they are in control, but then claim huge amounts of money when they’re unauthoris­ed,’ said one legal source involved in the case. ‘There’s ridiculous hypocrisy involved.’

Kensington Palace declined to comment but referred to William and Kate’s statement last year, in which they ‘wished to make the point strongly that this kind of unjustifie­d intrusion should not happen’. The timing of the appeal is unfortunat­e – today Meghan will board the Royal Train to travel with the Queen to Cheshire for their first day of public engagement­s together tomorrow.

‘Steamy body shots to promote themselves’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom