Scottish Daily Mail

DISHONOURS LIST

÷Gongs for pair ÷ Three clients of a who sit on panel single agent honoured

- By Daniel Martin and Josh White

‘Should declare an interest’

THE tainted honours system was in the dock again last night after it emerged that two top awards went to people sitting on the very committees which hand them out.

Kanya King, founder of a major music awards ceremony, and engineer Naomi Climer both received CBEs.

And three honours went to clients of a literary agent who sits on one of the decision-making honours committees.

These include historian Simon Schama, who was knighted, and author Jeanette Winterson, who was given a CBE.

Last week’s Queen’s Birthday Honours were dubbed ‘rewards for failure’ after Mark Carne, the outgoing boss of Network rail, received a CBE amid travel chaos for millions of commuters.

The honours system has also regularly been criticised for rewarding political donors and cronies with peerages.

Last night the Cabinet Office admitted that two of last week’s recipients sat on the committees which recommende­d them for awards. But a spokesman insisted they had not been involved in the discussion­s about their own awards.

All honours are first considered by one of nine sub-committees before going on to be considered by the main honours committee.

Miss King, the founder of the Mobo (Music of Black Origin) Awards, is one of six independen­t members of the arts and media committee, which recommends who from the entertainm­ent world should receive honours. Last week it was announced she had received a CBE for ‘services to music and culture’.

Miss Climer, trustee of the Institute for Engineerin­g and Technology, also received a CBE for ‘services to the engineerin­g profession’. She sat on the science and technology committee, which recommends people for awards from this sector.

It also emerged that three authors and academics who received awards were represente­d by a literary agent who sits on the arts and media committee. She is Caroline Michel, chief executive of the Peters Fraser and Dunlop literary agency.

They included Miss Winterson, whose novels include Oranges Are Not The Only Fruit, and academic Dr Gus Casely-Hayford, who received an OBE.

It is likely that both these awards were considered by the arts and media committee, on which Miss Michel sits.

Historian Simon Schama, whom she also represents, received a knighthood.

However, it is understood that this award – which was given for his reputation as an academic rather than as a broadcaste­r – was considered by the separate education committee, and not Miss Michel’s committee.

A spokesman for the Cabinet Office said systems are in place to ensure committee members are not involved in decisions regarding themselves or profession­al colleagues. The rules state that people should declare an interest if they have a profession­al relationsh­ip with a potential recipient.

And if a committee member is put forward for an award, they are not involved in any discussion­s regarding the case – and should not even know their case is being discussed.

The Cabinet Office spokesman said: ‘recognisin­g that independen­t committees are composed of experts in their sectors, and inevitably have profession­al associatio­ns with nominees from time to time, we have a full process in place where declaratio­ns of interest are concerned. Where necessary, candidates are considered out of committee, to ensure that the honours nomination process remains confidenti­al, robust and transparen­t. This is the case if serving committee members are nominated for service falling within the remit of the committee on which they serve.’

Miss Climer and Miss Michel declined to comment. Miss King said: ‘I was totally unaware of my nomination and any suggestion otherwise is ridiculous.’

WHAT a remarkable coincidenc­e that two of the most prestigiou­s awards on last week’s honours list went to people who sit on the very committees that hand out gongs – while three more went to writers whose literary agent just happens to sit on one of the committees.

Doesn’t this smack of blatant cronyism? Who’s going to scrutinise the scrutineer­s?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom