Scottish Daily Mail

Singing the Brexit blues

- Ruth Sunderland BUSINESS EDITOR

BACK in those long ago, barely remembered days before the referendum, companies used to blame the weather if their profits dropped.

Either it was too hot, too cold or too wet. No one seemed to have told them about the unpredicta­ble British seasons.

Now they blame Brexit. or as newsagent McColl’s did when its shares fell to near record lows yesterday, they blame the weather and Brexit.

Amigo, a sub-prime lending business whose shares fell dramatical­ly yesterday, cited the possibilit­y of No Deal as a risk to its bottom line: if the economy tanks, it could mean more borrowers are unable to pay their debts.

Software group Micro Focus, whose shares plunged after a profit warning, said its problems are down to a ‘deteriorat­ing macro environmen­t’. Translated into English, that means they are worried about Brexit plus Trump and his trade war, plus Germany’s weak economy.

Recruitmen­t company Hays, another whose profits took a hit, was also complainin­g that ‘macro-economic conditions’ had become ‘increasing­ly difficult’. There are, of course, other explanatio­ns. Micro Focus has been under the cosh ever since it took over the software business of Hewlett Packard Enterprise a couple of years ago in an $8.8bn deal that resulted in a severe case of indigestio­n.

The interestin­gly named Amigo, whose interest charges of a smidge under 50pc APR are far from friendly, is arguably more susceptibl­e to customer complaints and a crackdown by regulators than it is to Brexit.

Hopes that the london Stock Exchange might play host to the world’s biggest float – of giant Saudi oil enterprise Aramco – have also been hit. It is apparently looking at a two-stage share offering on the Saudi and Tokyo exchanges instead.

Advisers have apparently got cold feet about london because of uncertaint­y around Brexit. Again, there are multiple agendas at work, so it isn’t that simple.

But whatever the reasons, a string of firms with falling profits, the cold-shoulder from Aramco, and a slide in sterling don’t add up to a mood-enhancing tonic. Boris the Booster wants to lift the economy by sheer force of positivity, but not everyone got the memo.

Promises, promises

CALL me cynical, but I am not entirely reassured that Andrea leadsom, the Business Secretary, has been talking to Advent to extract reassuranc­es over our national interest if it takes over Cobham.

The now notorious takeover of Cadbury by US cheese-maker Kraft a decade ago, with its broken promises over a factory closure, woke politician­s up to the fact there are real risks to British jobs, pensions, R&D and investment when firms are taken over.

In the case of Cobham, there is also a national security and defence aspect. Advent will probably offer to sign up for a similar list of undertakin­gs as Melrose did at the time of its hostile bid for engineer GKN.

These included promises to keep the headquarte­rs here, to remain listed on the london Stock Exchange, to maintain R&D spending and to have a majority of UK-resident directors. This sounds deceptivel­y soothing. Any undertakin­gs by Advent will be presented as ‘legally binding’, but clever lawyers can find a way round most things.

They are likely to be time-limited, possibly for five years, which is not a long stretch in engineerin­g terms. And there may be other undesirabl­e and unforeseen eventualit­ies not covered by the pledges.

With Melrose, the authoritie­s can wave big sticks at the directors because it is a UK listed company, whose founders are British. Advent, however, is a US private equity firm and so the authoritie­s may have less leverage over their future behaviour.

The risk is that predators make undertakin­gs as a sop that turn out not to be worth the paper they are written on.

Green Steel

IT’S welcome news that the Government is spending £390m on low-carbon technology, much of which will go to the steel industry.

But the new Clean Steel Fund will not, of itself, reverse years of government policy that have landed UK producers with far heavier energy bills than competitor­s: the difference between this country and Germany, for example, is £55m a year. A little-known fact is that plants are also hit by the heavy business rates that have hurt shops on the High Street.

let’s not cavil. This is a step in the right direction. Now the Government needs to take another, and rethink its attitude towards British Steel. Waving through a sale to the Turkish military pension fund is not the best way to ensure the future of such a vital strategic industry.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom