Scottish Daily Mail

Are Dyson’s £400 straighten­ers as hot as the hype? THE VERDICT

- by Claire Coleman

When Dyson released a hairdryer that claimed to blow-dry six times as fast using supersonic technology, women scrambled to get their hands on one — even at the hair-curling price of £299.

It was a genuine revolution in design that has proved enduringly popular. now the company wants to pull off the same trick, with a set of straighten­ers said to be just as transforma­tive.

They work at lower temperatur­es, allegedly cause only half as much damage to your hair — and, oh yes, they’re cordless so you can finally see yourself properly in the mirror while straighten­ing.

The Dyson Corrale straighten­ers were launched last week to great hype. The only obvious downside is the price, since at £399.99 these will set you back even more than the hairdryer.

So, could it really be worth shelling out nearly £400? I tested the Dyson Corrale against another recent release, the BaByliss 9000, which is also cordless, but comes in at half the price . . .

THE CLEVER TECH

MoST straighten­ers work using ceramic plates that heat up, ironing out curls and kinks in your hair. Dyson boasts it’s created the only straighten­ers with ‘flexing’ plates, which bend slightly in the area where you’re applying pressure. This, apparently, helps to disperse heat more evenly, meaning you can style at lower temperatur­es and cause less damage.

The BaByliss 9000 has ‘floating’ plates which means that, in common with many straighten­ers, there are springs underneath them to help them glide smoothly over your hair. But as the plate itself is thicker, it doesn’t flex. A tiny computer in the BaByliss also regulates the heat to ensure consistent straighten­ing.

I decided to straighten half my hair with the BaByliss, and half with the Dyson, and to only pass the straighten­ers through each section once so I could see how fast they worked. The BaByliss takes 50 seconds to heat to its top setting of 200c. The result is good, but a few sections could have benefited from an extra pass.

The Dyson takes 55 seconds to reach its top temperatur­e of 210c. The results were impressive. My hair was poker-straight and not a single section needed going over again. I couldn’t tell if that was due to Dyson’s extra 10c of heat or the technology, so I tried it again at 165c and got perfect results. It’s pretty impressive.

WINNER: DYSON

GOOD LOOKS?

The Dyson design is chunkier than usual straighten­ers and, at more than half a kilo, is also more than twice the weight of most. There’s a nifty button you slide to lock the straighten­ers shut — great for travel — plus more for power and the temperatur­e settings. The BaByliss set, on the other hand, has a single power button that you press to turn on or off or scroll through temperatur­e settings. Again, the battery adds heft, but they’re noticeably lighter than the Dyson version.

WINNER: BABYLISS

POWER PLAY

BoTh models have rechargeab­le batteries although the Dyson also comes with a cord. The Dyson model’s charger has an AC/DC power supply that can be used anywhere in the world. You can either attach the magnetic pin to the bottom of the straighten­ers, or to a stand which functions as a charging dock. It should take just 70 minutes to fully charge the device for 30 minutes’ use.

The BaByliss offers the same global charger although it does take longer to get going. A threehour charge should give you 30 minutes of use. There’s also a handy light that turns green to show when they’re fully charged.

WINNER: DYSON

ADDED EXTRAS

YoU don’t need to panic about accidental­ly leaving the BaByliss on. They go into sleep mode five minutes after use and the temperatur­e drops to 120c. After five more minutes, they turn off.

Dyson has the same feature as well as some useful extras. For example, you can use the straighten­ers while they are plugged in and charging.

The Dyson also has a special ‘flight mode’ — a tab you pull out that means the battery is no longer connected to the heat element, something the Civil Aviation Authority says is necessary if you want to take battery-powered straighten­ers on a plane.

WINNER: DYSON

IF TheY were the same price, the Dyson would win on performanc­e alone. The straighten­ers are a real deluxe option, with every added extra you can imagine, despite being significan­tly heavier which may put some people off.

Still, I’m sure I won’t be the only one who struggles to justify the cost. If you’re a straighten­ing addict looking for a high performanc­e pair, and you can justify spending £400, I don’t think you’ll be disappoint­ed by the Dyson. But for anyone else, the BaByliss will do just fine.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom