Scottish Daily Mail

I was hit with a £900 bill from E.ON’s not-so smart meter

-

I CHANGED to energy supplier E.ON in August 2019 and took up its offer of a smart meter. I think it installed the dumbest one they had in stock.

From the word go, the ‘in house display’ has not worked. The engineer said it would take a few weeks to sort itself out. I rang several times over many weeks and kept being told it would sort itself out.

In March I was promised a call from the complaints department but it never came. I have chased it up on numerous occasions.

My monthly payments dropped from £123.67 to £17 in March. I rang again, knowing this would not cover usage. I was told I was more than £300 in credit, which I knew could not be right as it was estimating the bill.

When I supplied actual readings, my online bill was more than £900.

L. O., by email.

You began complainin­g to E.on last november but were given the moronic response that your daft meter would sort itself out!

For a ‘can’t be bothered’ customer service response, this is up there with the best. When your complaint dragged on, E.on rolled out the Covid excuse of having ‘limited resources’. (I am sick to the back teeth of energy companies using Covid-19 as an excuse for poor service. Phone, internet and email can all be handled by people working from home.)

now, I would love to tell you precisely what happened but, although I have received a general statement from E.on, two batches of follow-up questions I sent have not received a response.

However, you tell me after my interventi­on engineers arrived to replace your smart meter. But the new one also did not work, so they installed an oldstyle one.

In the meantime, you paid £700 in two instalment­s.

E.on could not get a reading from your original smart meter so you were given an estimated reading, which resulted in a £204 rebate. A graph you sent me suggests your use in spring rocketed while we were basking in two months of sunshine and warmth.

Your direct debit was then moved back to £125, a better reflection of your actual usage.

E.on says: ‘A communicat­ion issue affecting the meter and her in-home display meant we were unable to collect accurate readings on her energy usage. unfortunat­ely this led to us basing her bills on estimated use.’ E.on failed to offer compensati­on. When your contract comes up for renewal, you know what to do. IN DECEMBER last year I booked a cruise to the Norwegian fjords and took out travel insurance with Staysure. I had a colonoscop­y on February 14 after a screening test and was told that I had a tumour. On March 19 I had surgery to remove a section of my bowel.

At the end of March, before the final payment was due, I cancelled the cruise because my medical future was uncertain. I put a claim into Staysure for my £920 deposit. It is refusing on grounds that I wasn’t covered for cancellati­ons caused by Covid.

P. W., Whitstable, Kent. I’m afraid your claim got caught up in the pandemic and a mistake was made. When I pointed out your problem, Staysure immediatel­y refunded the full £920 including the £65 excess. It has also given you £100 as a goodwill gesture.

A Staysure spokesman explains: ‘We pride ourselves on doing things the right way. Since the pandemic, we have seen unpreceden­ted volumes of customer queries and claims. We have worked extremely hard to ensure the disruption to our customers is minimal but recognise mr W. has been impacted. We are confident that this was a symptom of the crisis and not a reflection of our processes.’ MY SISTER-IN-LAW has severe dementia and is in residentia­l care. Post Office Money wrote to her on January 10 to say her £10,240 loyalty bond paying 1.35 pc matured in 20 days. There were reinvestme­nt options of 1.35 pc, 1.4 pc or 1.47 pc.

We wrote to say we had applied to the Court of Protection to take over her affairs and asked Post Office Money to roll her money over. But it could not. On February 18 we sent the Court of Protection Order and proof of our identities. But it would not accept our authority to act on behalf of my sister-in-law.

Her £10,240 is now in a Post Office account paying only 0.01pc interest. We have tried, unsuccessf­ully, to close this. After further letters and phone calls, it agreed to accept copies of our passports, driving licences and council tax bills, subject to their being authorised by our local postmistre­ss. This cost more than £30. We sent the documents on May 29.

We have now been told the Post Office has a backlog and has no idea when it will be able to deal with this matter. To add insult to injury, it sent a letter, dated May 23, saying my sister-in-law’s signature was required as ours do not match its records.

K and S. J., Norwich, Norfolk.

THE Post office has worked with its banking provider, the Bank of Ireland, and you have received an apology for the poor service. The account has been closed and the funds transferre­d to the account you requested. You will also receive £250 in compensati­on.

You tell me that after covering the bond interest and costs there should be about £150 surplus.

Your generous decision is to give £100 of this to the care home to provide extras for residents and £50 to the Salvation Army in norwich to help homeless people.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Money Mail’s letters page tackles all your financial headaches
Money Mail’s letters page tackles all your financial headaches

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom