BLUEPRINT FOR NEW LOCKDOWN Pubs, restaurants face closure, travel restrictions in force Six more months of hardship to be revealed today
Scotland may be shut down over half-term, claims leaked report
SCOTS face travel bans and the closure of bars and restaurants as part of a proposed ‘circuit breaker’ to halt the rapid spread of coronavirus.
nicola Sturgeon yesterday confirmed she is considering the reintroduction of key elements of the first lockdown for short periods as part of a renewed battle against the resurgence of the virus.
A leaked document showed ‘circuit breaker’ restrictions – including the closure of bars and restaurants, curbs on travel and the shutdown of hairdressers and beauty salons – could be brought in for one or two weeks next month to coincide with the school holidays.
Medical experts also yesterday gave a stark warning that Scotland faces the threat of thousands of cases a day by the middle of next month unless urgent action is taken – and the number of positive tests could soar to 50,000 a day across the UK.
It came amid growing alarm about the spread of the virus, with chief medical officers saying last night that the UK alert level should rise to level four, meaning transmission is
‘high or rising exponentially’. Further details are expected to be announced by Miss Sturgeon at Holyrood today, while Boris Johnson will update MPs at Westminster.
The Prime Minister will also hold talks through the Cobra emergency committee this morning, after agreement that there would be a ‘united approach’ across the UK ‘as much as possible’.
The leaked Scottish Government document, released by an anonymous social media account and confirmed by sources as genuine, says a ‘circuit breaker’ could be introduced alongside other restrictions for a fixed two-week period or during school holidays next month. Measures could include telling people only to leave home for essential reasons, shutting schools, closing hospitality venues, switching universities to remote learning, closing entertainment venues and tourist attractions, and only allowing travel of five miles or less.
Asked yesterday if such measures could be reintroduced for short periods of time, Miss Sturgeon said: ‘Yes, all of those different elements of lockdown are under consideration and will always be there to be under consideration.
‘But partly what we are trying to do right now is take steps early and decisively to get R (the reproduction rate) back under one, get the virus back under control, so we can avoid the kind of really strict extended lockdown that we had beginning back in March.’
Miss Sturgeon said that she had been ‘immersed’ in discussions with advisers over the weekend, and ‘doing nothing in the face of this quite rapid spread now is not an option’.
She added: ‘At the heart of this is a simple truth: the longer we wait to introduce new measures, the longer these measures are likely to be in place.
‘If we move sharply now to get the virus back under control, we can minimise the time we all spend under any new restrictions. I need to be absolutely straight with people that additional restrictions will almost certainly be put in place in Scotland over the next couple of days.’
A Scottish Government spokesman said: ‘We do not comment on leaked documents. As the First Minister said, we’re looking at a wide range of options. No final decisions have been made.’
BACK in December, an impossibly long time ago, Pete Wishart suggested a clever new tactic for the independence movement. The Perth MP, reflecting on that month’s election result, said SNP activists must build on their success with ‘gentle persuasion’.
That may sound like a sinister euphemism (the kind of thing that might be followed by ‘fetch the thumb screws’), but being nice to Unionists for once was – for the SNP – a novel idea.
Much has happened since then, including a pandemic, but fastforward to this weekend and a leading Nationalist was engaged in a little reflection of his own.
Angus Robertson, a close ally of Nicola Sturgeon, said the deaths of 55,000 ‘predominantly No supporting older voters’ every year had positive consequences for independence.
His article, in a slavishly pro-SNP newspaper, said ‘predominantly Yes-supporting’ 16-yearolds joining the electorate had produced a gain of more than 100,000 for the Scexiteers.
The demise of No voters meant a ‘likely net gain of more than 100,000 for independence’.
Well, politics is a cynical business, but whatever happened to Mr Wishart’s plea for inclusiveness and a more conciliatory, bridgebuilding approach?
It lasted all of five minutes, but with the SNP riding high in the polls – for now, anyway – its hierarchs can’t help publicly indulging in a little amateur psephology, of a decidedly brutal variety.
Charade
At a time when the SNP Government is accused of presiding over a Covid disaster in our care homes, the proposition that the deaths of elderly people is any way a ‘gain’ is abhorrent.
The Mr Nice Guy routine was always a charade and no one really bought it, probably including Mr Wishart, who was criticised by some SNP supporters at the time for implying that they weren’t all terribly nice people.
Anyone who logged onto social media six years ago – notwithstanding the nostalgia of top SNP figures over the anniversary of the referendum on Friday – might well recall that it wasn’t much fun for those of us branded traitors or Quislings.
Among those with fond memories was Mike Russell, the SNP’s pompous ‘Brexit Minister’, who tweeted that if Scotland had chosen independence in 2014 ‘we would now be a normal, small, self-determining, EU member’.
Instead, we ‘face unprecedented chaos, inflicted against our will’, but – he insisted – ‘we will get a second chance’.
Remember that this is a government laser-focused on fighting coronavirus, and indeed one which fairly recently had intended to ‘eliminate’ it, though that idea may be on the backburner.
And how ‘normal’ would it be if, say, Mr Robertson was in the ruling administration of an independent Scotland – a man who can see the bright side of the deaths of very large numbers of elderly Scots?
In the toxic swill-tub of Twitter, populated largely by axe-grinding egotists, downright bigots (and entirely rational newspaper commentators), there was a lot of lamentation along these lines from separatists in contemplative mood.
Mr Russell even got himself into a scrap with broadcaster Andrew Neil, who took issue with a claim from expat actor Alan Cumming that Scots face ‘insidious and subliminal racism’ in London.
Mr Russell said Mr Cumming, a vocal Scexit backer, was entitled to his opinion, telling Mr Neil that the presenter’s reaction ‘alleges organised conspiracy’.
Mr Neil was right to dismiss this comment as ‘dissembling nonsense’, and most who remember frenzied talk in independence circles of secret oilfields might wonder if it’s a bit rich of Mr Russell to condemn other people’s conspiracy theories.
Senior Nationalists weren’t much in evidence on social media, or anywhere else, condemning those daft and dangerous racists who gathered on motorway bridges over the summer, waving black Saltires to ward off English tourists.
Perhaps there’s a hierarchy of racism; but if there is, in Mr Russell’s world, Scots are often at the receiving end, and he fearlessly spoke up in defence of a rich celebrity who lives in, er, New York.
It may serve the SNP’s agenda to insinuate there’s rampant prejudice in Britain, and that Scots are hated in the nation’s capital.
There are at least 800,000 people born in Scotland living in England: how many of them, like Mr Cumming, are the target of anti-Scottishness?
Trevor Philips, former head of the Commission for Racial Equality, kicked over a hornets’ nest yesterday when he wondered whether Scots in England should be able to vote in another referendum on Scottish independence.
Citizenship
Before the 2014 vote, Mr Philips published an analysis for the think tank Demos of a sample of 7,884 voters who were identified as being of Scottish origins: 3,489 living in Scotland, 4,395 in England and Wales.
Mr Philips said: ‘We predicted... that the 40 per cent entitled to vote [ie those living in Scotland] would divide 58:42 in favour of No...
‘What was more significant, however, was that the other 60 per cent divided very differently. No had a 41 percentage point lead among Scots living elsewhere in the UK – more or less a 70:30 split.’
It’s easy to see why Nationalists are opposed to the notion of giving Scots living outside Scotland the vote, though as Mr Philips pointed out, citizenship of the bright new post-Indyref 2 Scotland would be open to them. Isn’t it unjust to deny them a say in whether Scotland should go it alone – while also conferring on them the status of ‘citizens’?
So Mr Russell might agree Scots are living in hostile territory in London, that their opinions matter, that they would be Scottish citizens after independence – but they still wouldn’t get a vote in another poll. There are plenty of anomalies in this debate, but this is one that won’t go away, even if the SNP is desperate for it to disappear.
Nor will the matter of what should be asked if there was a rerun of the vote – Nationalists are deeply opposed to a Brexit-style Leave or Remain question. They don’t want gerrymandering, unless they’re the ones doing it, in which case it’s fine.
Similarly, they’d like a fair debate, with each side respecting the other, but occasionally – quite often, in fact – the mask slips and we get another glimpse of the ugly heart of nationalism.
Mr Robertson’s candid assessment of the electoral situation is a new low from a party that appeared to have hit rock bottom. But don’t be fooled by the tosh about civility: they’re out to win and the stakes couldn’t be higher.
And, unforgivably, they don’t care, it seems, who’s hurt in the process – when even the old are seen not as human beings but as impediments to the realisation of the SNP’s dream of destroying the UK.