Scottish Daily Mail

PM CRONY STORM

Boris overrules advisers to hand peerage to ex-Tory treasurer embroiled in donations-for-access scandal

- By Daniel Martin Policy Editor

BORIS J ohnson was embroiled in another cronyism row last night after he overruled his advisers to hand a peerage to a controvers­ial Tory donor.

The Prime Minister decided to ennoble City tycoon Peter Cruddas despite a recommenda­tion from the House of Lords Appointmen­ts Commission that he should be turned down.

It advised against the honour because Mr Cruddas resigned as Conservati­ve co-treasurer in 2012 after it was claimed he offered access to then PM David Cameron and his chancellor George Osborne in return for donations. It is believed he has been turned down numerous times before. Mr Cruddas, 67, donated £50,000 to Mr Johnson’s Tory leadership campaign last year and has given £3million to the Conservati­ves since 2007. The PM’s decision to ignore the commission came weeks after he over-ruled another adviser when he reported that Home Secretary Priti Patel had breached the ministeria­l code by bullying aides.

And earlier t his year he defended former chief adviser Dominic Cummings over his trip from London to Durham in what most saw as a lockdown breach.

Mr Cruddas was one of 16 new peers announced yesterday, including former Archbishop of York John Sentamu and ex-MI5 boss Sir Andrew Parker, as the list was slipped out three days before Christmas.

But Lords Speaker Lord Fowler expressed fears that the Upper House is already getting too large.

He said: ‘Mr Johnson has added 16 to his list of appointmen­ts bringing the total for the year up to 52 new peers over two lists.

‘My fundamenta­l concern is about the number of new peers that have been appointed by the Prime Minister in his first 12 months in office.

‘This list will bring the total in the House of Lords to over 830 – almost 200 more than the House of Commons.’ In an apparent reference to the ennoblemen­t of Mr Cruddas, he added: ‘It may also now be the time to review the role and the powers of the House of Lords Appointmen­ts Commission. To add insult to injury, for the second time the announceme­nt of new peers has been made when Parliament is not sitting. Sometimes the Lords i tself is blamed for a failure to change.

‘One rule for the Tories and chums’

‘My answer to that is – don’t blame the Lords, blame successive government­s who have avoided the subject. ‘The reply has been that change is “not a priority”. It is possible that with the last two lists the public may now disagree.’

Mr Cruddas resigned as party cotreasure­r in 2012 after a newspaper suggested he was offering access to Mr Cameron for a donation of £250,000 a year. But the following year he won £180,000 in damages in a libel victory against The Sunday Times, which had published the claims. The damages were later reduced to £50,000 on appeal.

In a letter to the commission, Mr Johnson said its rejection of Mr Cruddas’s nomination ‘relates to historic concerns’.

He added the most serious of the allegation­s were found to be ‘untrue and libellous’ and an internal Conservati­ve investigat­ion discovered ‘no intentiona­l wrongdoing’ on Mr Cruddas’s part.

Mr Johnson also said the committee found ‘no suggestion of any matters of concern’ before or since the 2012 allegation­s. He stressed the decision to go against the commission’s recommenda­tions is a ‘clear and rare exception’ to the norm. Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner said: ‘After months of revelation­s about the cronyism at the heart of this Government, it’s somehow appropriat­e the Prime Minister has chosen to end the year with a peerage to Peter Cruddas.’

She said there was ‘ one rule for the Conservati­ves and their chums, another for the rest of the country’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom