Scottish Daily Mail

Sending kids back to school ‘could see infection rise again’

- By Michael Blackley Scottish Political Editor

THE first phase of the return to Scotland’s schools may lead to an increase in coronaviru­s infection rates, according to the Scottish Government’s scientific advice.

Education Secretary John Swinney yesterday admitted that the R number – the average number of people infected by someone with Covid-19 – could rise as a consequenc­e of some pupils returning to the classroom today.

It came as a health expert accused the Scottish Government of ‘misinforma­tion’ about claims there are low levels of transmissi­on among younger children.

Pupils in primary 1-3 return to school full-time today, while nurseries also reopen and senior secondary pupils can attend to complete essential practical work.

Mr Swinney yesterday insisted the return to school is ‘safe’ – but also admitted it could lead to an increase in the R number, which is currently between 0.7 and 0.9.

Dr Deepti Gurdasani, an epidemiolo­gist at Queen Mary University in London, told BBC Scotland that the return of children was ‘really concerning’, citing surveys which suggest it is wrong to say there is not ‘significan­t transmissi­on’ in primary schools.

Asked if a letter to parents from national clinical director Jason Leitch saying younger children are less likely to get or pass on the virus was wrong, she said: ‘Yes, there is a lot of misinforma­tion around this, and a lot of it is based on interpreta­tion of flawed studies which have only included symptom-based testing for children.

‘We know that children are more likely to be asymptomat­ic, so if you only test them when they are symptomati­c you are going to miss a lot of transmissi­on.

‘Studies that are less biased, like the Office for National Statistics survey, which is a random survey of the population, show us that there is significan­t transmissi­on.’

She said schools should enforce mask use and introduce smaller classes and better ventilatio­n before allowing pupils to return.

Responding to the comments, Mr Swinney said: ‘I do believe it is safe. I base that view on the very detailed clinical analysis prepared for us by our education clinical advisory group. What that demonstrat­ed was that younger children are much less susceptibl­e to transmissi­on of this virus.’

He said safety measures put in place would ensure children are returning to a ‘safe environmen­t’.

However, when asked what the scientific advice says about how the first phase of the school return will push the R number up, he said: ‘It doesn’t give us an absolutely precise predictor but it does indicate that there is the possibilit­y of that happening.

‘Adults making sure they follow the physical distancing or maskwearin­g requiremen­ts at the school gate are critical to making sure the return of young children is not undermined by parental transmissi­on.

‘We don’t have a lot of headroom between where the R level is just now and 1, where the virus begins to spread exponentia­lly. We’ve got to avoid that at all costs.’

Ministers will look at evidence of the impact of today’s move before deciding whether to go ahead with phase two of the school return.

Scottish Conservati­ve education spokesman Jamie Greene said: ‘The return to schools for many pupils is a welcome step. However, it must be the first part of a sensible plan to continue to return young people to the classroom.’

‘Younger children less susceptibl­e’

 ??  ?? Evidence: John Swinney
Evidence: John Swinney

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom