Scottish Daily Mail

HARRY& MEGHAN: Uncovering the truth

6-PAGE INVESTIGAT­ION

- By Richard Kay and Guy Adams

Their explosive claims rocked the Royal Family and reverberat­ed across the world ... yet this dossier reveals many were contradict­ory or just wrong. Today the Mail appeals to Oprah and CBS to examine the facts and ask, in the name of responsibl­e journalism: Will they now investigat­e the TRUE story?

FOR almost a week their voices — angry, entitled, vengeful and bitter — have echoed over the airwaves. And in their wake has come the sound and fury of recriminat­ion.

Across the globe, the Harry and Meghan interview has divided families, communitie­s and even nations. Its fallout has been greater than anyone could have imagined. We have been bisected by race, by gender and by age.

The viewing figures alone are staggering: a television audience of 50 million so far — a number that is still growing.

At its heart, conducting it all, was Oprah Winfrey, whose own worldwide profile comes close to rivalling, possibly even eclipsing, that of Prince Harry and his wife. A self-made billionair­e, she is the most successful — and richest — media star on the planet.

Hugely respected, compassion­ate and possessing a credibilit­y unmatched by any other broadcaste­r, she is America’s royalty.

But with that authority and that status come obligation­s. When the claims come as thick and fast as they did from Harry and Meghan, it is hard to keep up. But due to their gravity, every single one must be challenged.

Regrettabl­y, that did not happen last Sunday night. Claims went untested, troubling allegation­s based on second-hand conversati­ons were undisputed, and interpreta­tions left unopposed and therefore accepted as the truth.

Gripping television it may have been, as Harry set about his family with an at times cold and ruthless detachment, but viewers were entitled to ask — and to expect — that these assertions would be questioned.

In the space of almost 90 minutes the reputation­s of the monarchy and of individual Royal Family members were dismantled.

YeT even the most egregious of the couple’s inflammato­ry remarks, such as those about racism, were allowed to escape serious scrutiny. It is hard to imagine a Dimbleby, a Paxman or a Humphrys allowing so many damaging statements to pass without drilling down to find context and perspectiv­e.

By any stretch of the imaginatio­n, the Harry and Meghan claims demanded to be properly and thoroughly investigat­ed.

Here, the Mail lays bare the contradict­ions and inaccuraci­es at the heart of their interview, untangling fact from fiction.

And today we appeal to U.S. broadcaste­r CBS and Oprah Winfrey herself: based on our report, can we now look forward to a follow-up — Harry & Meghan... The Other Side Of The Story?

 ??  ??
 ?? Pictures: HARPO PRODUCTION­S/JOE PUGLIESE; JANE BARLOW/PA; OWEN HUMPHREYS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES; MARK STEWART ??
Pictures: HARPO PRODUCTION­S/JOE PUGLIESE; JANE BARLOW/PA; OWEN HUMPHREYS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES; MARK STEWART
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Speaking out: Harry and Meghan during the interview
Speaking out: Harry and Meghan during the interview

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom