Laid bare, deadly danger of ‘traffic calming’ planters
After ambulance U-turn is caught on camera...
PLANTERS deployed to block residential roads and cut traffic have delayed ambulances, health chiefs said yesterday.
Worried residents filmed paramedics driving past their homes – only to come back the other way a few minutes later after encountering the obstacles.
They claimed the minutes wasted because of the ‘low traffic neighbourhood’ scheme could prove fatal for some patients.
Transport chiefs initially branded reports of delays as ‘misinformation’ – but ambulance bosses have confirmed crews have been forced into U-turns.
Since the start of the pandemic, councils around the country have been using planters to block roads in residential areas to prevent ‘rat-run’ drivers cutting through and to try to encourage motorists to switch to cycling or public transport.
Campaigners say the LTNs – some of which have open ‘filters’ to let emergency vehicles through – have cut accident rates and air pollution.
But since the closures were introduced in the Stockport suburb of Heaton Chapel in September on a trial basis, some homeowners have expressed fears about the disruption caused to the emergency services.
Footage appears to show several ambulances with blue lights flashing being forced to turn around – and locals giving directions to confused drivers.
After residents expressed concerns to Stockport council, its head of highways and transportation, Sue Stevenson, sent out letters seeking to ‘correct some misinformation that has circulated in recent days’.
She insisted ambulance crews ‘were not forced to find alternative routes or delayed on their way to emergency calls’ and that they were ‘fully aware’ of the positions of the traffic filters blocking certain routes. North West Ambulance Service subsequently investigated the incidents and said there had been ‘a number of delays as some ambulances had to navigate around the road closures’.
It said crews had not experienced delays linked to LTNs operating in other parts of the region. Alison Stafford-Bentley, a 55-yearold resident, said: ‘It really annoys me when they say that this is misinformation. How would they feel if it was one of their relatives waiting for an ambulance?’
She claimed delays were running at a rate of more than one a week – with one crew telling her on November 2 that they knew nothing of the closures. They’re trying to get to an emergency which they need to get to as quickly as possible and these filters are impeding them,’ she said.
Stockport council said it had been ‘in dialogue with the North West Ambulance Service since the trial began’ and had been assured crews had no issues.
Following the trust’s statement about the delays, it said it was ‘urgently awaiting the details’ so it could ‘understand the issues that crews have faced while travelling through the area’.
A spokesman added: ‘The safety of our residents is of paramount importance to the council.’
There have been similar complaints about LTNs in London. Earlier this year, it was revealed they had slowed down ambulance crews 159 times in the capital over an eight-month period.
Garrett Emmerson, who recently stepped down as head of the London Ambulance Service, said: ‘In certain situations I think they have delayed certain responses because they had to be put in very quickly’.
‘Cut accident rates and air pollution’
BLACK Friday turned out to be Bleak Friday for much of the travel industry when the Government announced that South Africa and five other African countries were going back on the dreaded red list. No warning. Less than 24 hours’ notice.
Another scramble, more rows about refunds — and more disappointment for those who had hoped to spend Christmas in any of those countries, especially
South Africa, to which more than 400,000 of us normally travel every year.
The speed of the decision tells us how seriously scientists are taking the new variant — the sinister B.1.1.529 — and things aren’t looking too positive on the Europe front, either, a subject we explore on pages 64-65 of this week’s Escape.
Once upon a time, it was just a simple matter of checking you had your passport before setting
off to the airport. Now there are all kind of hoops to jump through, especially when it comes to testing.
Even that can throw up anomalies. A friend was hoping to fly to Antigua in the Caribbean this morning but his PCR test, taken on Thursday, returned a positive result. He sought a second opinion by paying £90 for another test later the same day — and that was negative. One-one and into extra time. So yesterday morning he paid a further £90 for a third test and that, too, was negative.
But the rules are that one positive test and you are booted out of the departures lounge and dispatched into ten days of isolation.
How we all long for that moment when testing is no longer required and proof of vaccinations (yes, including the booster) is all that’s needed, along with a trusty passport.
When it comes to the Caribbean, you don’t need a test before going to the Dominican Republic, above, or Cuba. Too late for my friend — but good to know for the rest of us, as the first proper cold snap sweeps across our wintry isles.