BBC Sky at Night Magazine

RIPPLES, RADIATION AND REVELATION

A revolution that began with colliding neutron stars is taking place in astronomy. Will Gater looks at how electromag­netic and gravitatio­nal wave observatio­ns are expanding our view of the cosmos

- $%287 7+( :5,7(5 Will Gater is an astronomy journalist, author and presenter. Follow him on Twitter at @willgater or visit willgater.com

Gravitatio­nal wave data and electromag­netic radiation observatio­ns are being combined to shed new light on the workings of the cosmos.

Every so often, a true moment of scientific insight comes along, a moment that has a profound impact on how we explore the Universe. One such moment came in 2015 with the first detection of gravitatio­nal waves – ripples in the fabric of space-time that propagate from moving celestial bodies and violent events such as the merging of two black holes or neutron stars.

But despite the astronomic­al possibilit­ies gravitatio­nal waves grant us, it was another, more recent, observatio­n that opened up a new field of space science. That new field is multi-messenger astronomy, in which the secrets of the Universe are revealed through detecting and observing not only electromag­netic radiation, but gravitatio­nal waves and other celestial phenomena too. And its story begins around lunchtime, in August last year.

At 12:41 UT on 17 August 2017, the Laser Interferom­eter Gravitatio­nal-wave Observator­y (LIGO) detectors in Washington and Louisiana, USA, sensed a gravitatio­nal wave washing over their respective sites. What happened next would thrill researcher­s and set off a dramatic chain of events.

Mere seconds later, in space, NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and ESA’s Internatio­nal Gamma-Ray Astrophysi­cs Lab (INTEGRAL) satellite both caught a burst of gamma-rays emanating from somewhere in the southern celestial hemisphere. Could the two things be related?

“Less than a minute after the gamma-ray [burst] was picked up by the Fermi team, they notified everyone else that they’d seen something interestin­g and gave a rough sky map of the location,” recalls Dr Michalis Agathos, a LIGO-Virgo Collaborat­ion researcher based at the University of Cambridge.

The scramble to correlate

As news of the gamma-ray burst started to reach astronomer­s around the world, the LIGO researcher­s were already analysing the wave their detectors had sensed, which they’d now catalogued as GW170817. Like the Fermi and INTEGRAL teams, the LIGO researcher­s notified collaborat­ors at astronomic­al organisati­ons around the world with access to telescopes observing across practicall­y the entire electromag­netic spectrum.

Astronomer­s and gravitatio­nal wave researcher­s have started to work together like this in recent years in the hope of observing electromag­netic radiation (be it visible light, radio waves, X-rays or gammarays) from the events that trigger gravitatio­nal waves and send them rippling across the cosmos. Such an observatio­n of electromag­netic radiation had never been made alongside a gravitatio­nal wave before but now, with GW170817, the LIGO-Virgo team worked with great urgency to notify their colleagues who had spotted the Gamma-ray burst.

“We already knew that the Fermi team had circulated [news of the Gamma-rays] so everyone at LIGO worked hard to get [details of GW170817] out fast with as much accurate informatio­n as possible,” says Agathos.

Using data from a third detector, Virgo in Italy, the researcher­s were able to narrow down the area of the sky that GW170817 had come from. “When we cross-checked our sky map with that of Fermi, which was relatively wide but still narrowed down the location to a few hundred square degrees, we noticed a significan­t overlap. That encouraged people to believe that this was something that may be picked up by other telescopes,” says Agathos.

"For the very first time, researcher­s had caught both electromag­netic radiation and gravitatio­nal waves emanating from an astronomic­al phenomenon"

On the ground, the profession­al observator­ies in Chile slewed towards the area specified by the LIGOVirgo team, picking out a new pinprick of light in NGC 4993, a galaxy around 130 million lightyears away. Meanwhile in orbit, both the Hubble Space Telescope and NASA’s Swift satellite spotted it too, while the Chandra X-ray Observator­y would later detect X-rays streaming from the same location. One estimate from the European Southern Observator­y suggests that around 70 observator­ies saw the glowing dot that had appeared in the distant galaxy. More significan­t than the large number of eyes on the new spot of light, however, is what the diversity of observatio­ns constitute­d.

For the very first time, researcher­s had caught both electromag­netic radiation and gravitatio­nal waves emanating from an astronomic­al phenomenon. And with the data they’d amassed, the science of multimesse­nger astronomy – of studying distant celestial objects by examining more than just the light they emit – took a vast leap forward.

As had long been hoped, decades of technologi­cal improvemen­ts had brought gravitatio­nal wave detection to the point where it could work in concert with all kinds of observator­ies to provide astronomer­s with a new way to scrutinise astrophysi­cal processes. And nowhere was this better demonstrat­ed than in the revelation­s that came from the analysis of the GW170817 event.

Looking beyond the wave

“The data that we see in [a] gravitatio­nal wave detection is in a waveform,” says Agathos. “You can see it as a wave that evolves in a certain way and the structure of it gives you informatio­n about the source that generated it.”

Analysis of the GW170817 gravitatio­nal wave suggested that the event which had produced it was a violent collision between two neutron stars that had been spiralling in towards each other. When the two stars finally collided, the force of the impact shuddered the fabric of space-time, sending the gravitatio­nal wave rippling across the cosmos. It also illuminate­d their host galaxy with a powerful blast of radiation – the light the world’s telescopes picked up in August.

The identifica­tion of a neutron star binary system as the origin of GW170817 was important in itself. The initial flash that the Fermi telescope saw was a phenomenon known as a short gamma-ray burst. Short gamma-ray bursts had been observed many times prior to the GW170817 event and one of the theories that astronomer­s had put forward for what causes them was the merging of neutron stars.

With Fermi’s observatio­n of the short gamma-ray burst and a simultaneo­us detection of a gravitatio­nal wave produced by a collision of neutron stars, astronomer­s now had a key piece of evidence to support that theory.

The kilonova question

This revelation from the study of the GW170817 gravitatio­nal wave was the first triumph of multimesse­nger astronomy, but it wasn’t the only one. The telescopes observing the electromag­netic radiation from the explosion caused by the two neutron stars colliding were able to capture spectra of the event. In doing so they were able to shed light on one of the great enigmas in astrophysi­cs: where some of the heaviest elements in the Universe come from.

“Once you have the spectrum you can infer things about the [chemical] compositio­n of the matter that you’re observing,” says Agathos. “The fact that we saw spectral lines of certain elements in this detection indicated that a big portion of elements, such as gold, platinum, uranium or other heavy elements, [are] actually produced in this type of process. This had been an open question for decades.”

Those heavy elements were flung out by the explosion observed by the follow-up telescopes – a powerful blast known as a ‘kilonova’, which astronomer­s had for many years suspected would occur when two neutron stars smash together. Kilonovae are fainter and release less material than supernovae, but as they dim rapidly they’re much more tricky to catch.

“This revelation from the study of GW170817 was the first triumph of multi multi-messenger astronomy, but it wasn’t the only one”

“Sometimes you can see objects that have characteri­stics which would have looked like the theoretica­l models put forward for a kilonova,” says Dr Kate Maguire, an expert in supernovae from Queen’s University, Belfast. “But because they fade away very quickly from their brightness we never had good datasets.”

Indeed, the multi-messenger nature of the GW170817 observatio­ns was crucial to positively identifyin­g it as the kilonova predicted by models. “This is the first object that’s conclusive­ly a kilonova, because we have the gravitatio­nal wave detection of the two neutron stars merging,” adds Maguire.

More messages

Astronomer­s hope to make more multi-messenger observatio­ns of kilonovae in order to get a better understand­ing of these events. But future multimesse­nger astronomy studies may also offer new insight into their more energetic cousins, supernovae, as well. And that’s because there’s another type of ‘messenger’ to pick up, a messenger that wasn’t detected in the GW170817 event but one that could reveal the inner workings of these violent stellar detonation­s: neutrinos.

Neutrino particles can be produced in the powerful core-collapse supernovae that occur when a massive star dies, but they’re extraordin­arily hard to detect and require specialist detectors, such as the IceCube Neutrino observator­y located at the South Pole. “We’ve only seen neutrinos from one supernova, 1987A, and that was 20 neutrinos out of [a theorised total of] 1058,” says Maguire.

Neverthele­ss if a supernova went off in the Milky Way and enough neutrinos could be detected from the blast, along with gravitatio­nal waves and electromag­netic radiation, it would be a pivotal observatio­n. “The neutrinos would tell us about the explosion mechanism of the core-collapse supernova,” explains Maguire. “The gravitatio­nal wave detection would be very nice for tying down the properties of the system, such as the mass. And we’d have the electromag­netic radiation as well – because it would be a supernova in our galaxy we’d be able to get very detailed observatio­ns. It would be incredibly exciting if we were able to do that.”

With LIGO coming back online later this year, profession­al astronomer­s will be preparing to jump into action when another gravitatio­nal wave signal is detected. But there’s another developmen­t on the horizon that should excite amateur astronomer­s too. In the future, the private notificati­ons that the LIGO team send out to collaborat­ors alerting them to a potential new gravitatio­nal wave event will be made more widely available.

“One cannot exclude the possibilit­y that certain sources may be observable by amateur astronomer­s with decent telescopes,” says Agathos. “For instance the host galaxy of the first neutron star binary [merger] detection was something in the region of [mag.] +12.4 and the source itself was not much dimmer. With a decent telescope, if you’re lucky enough and you’re in a place where the sky is dark and clear, you may actually be able to discover things before the large telescopes do.”

The future of multi-messenger astronomy will certainly involve advanced, profession­al observator­ies and rapid-reaction, wide-field telescopes working alongside gravitatio­nal wave and neutrino detectors. But in among the authors of forthcomin­g studies they produce, we may well also see the names of dedicated amateurs working from their own back gardens.

 ??  ?? 22 Aug 26 Aug 28 Aug
Main image: it took just 12 hours for scientists to determine that the gravitatio­nal wave and gamma-ray burst had originated from the galaxy NGC 4993, where they also spotted an associated kilonova (circled). Inset images: the...
22 Aug 26 Aug 28 Aug Main image: it took just 12 hours for scientists to determine that the gravitatio­nal wave and gamma-ray burst had originated from the galaxy NGC 4993, where they also spotted an associated kilonova (circled). Inset images: the...
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The few confirmed neutrinos that have been detected were picked up moments before the light from Supernova 1987A reached Earth
The few confirmed neutrinos that have been detected were picked up moments before the light from Supernova 1987A reached Earth
 ??  ?? Neutrinos can travel vast distances without interactin­g with any matter, which makes them difficult to detect
Neutrinos can travel vast distances without interactin­g with any matter, which makes them difficult to detect
 ??  ?? A team of around 300 physicists search for neutrinos using the IceCube Observator­y at the South Pole
A team of around 300 physicists search for neutrinos using the IceCube Observator­y at the South Pole

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom