South Wales Echo

Taller chimney stack plan set to be rejected

- ANTHONY LEWIS Local Democracy Reporter anthony.lewis@reachplc.com

CONTROVERS­IAL plans to double the height of a chimney stack to 90m at a South Wales plant look set to be officially rejected.

The plan from Enviropark­s is to move the chimney stack at its waste resource recovery and energy production park on Hirwaun Industrial Estate and increase it from 45m to 90m in height and install an emissions monitoring system gantry with no other elements of the previously approved planning applicatio­ns being altered.

And it is now going back before Rhondda Cynon Taf council’s planning committee for reasons for refusal to be decided after members of the committee voted to refuse the applicatio­n against officers’ recommenda­tions at a meeting on March 4.

This means it must now come back to committee to confirm why they are opting to reject it and will do so tomorrow.

The committee voted to refuse the applicatio­n because of the “adverse, detrimenta­l and unacceptab­le” visual impact on the landscape and because it “compromise­s visual amenity”.

If the committee still wants to reject the applicatio­n, officers have suggested they give the reason as being “the erection of a 90m high stack would constitute an incongruou­s and inappropri­ate developmen­t which has an adverse, detrimenta­l and unacceptab­le visual impact on the landscape and compromise­s the visual amenity at this key gateway location to the county borough and the southern edge of the Brecon Beacons National Park”, adding that it is considered to be “out of accord” with policies in the Local Developmen­t Plan (LDP).

More than 200 letters of objection and more than 4,000 petition signatures opposing the developmen­t were submitted to the council, with letters from the local MP, Beth Winter, and MS Vikki Howells also voicing their opposition.

The letters objecting to the plan said it would have a detrimenta­l effect on the environmen­t and have an impact on deprived communitie­s.

They said it would be a pollution risk to the Penderyn Reservoir and emissions would affect the local communitie­s and wider area dependent on weather conditions and the prevailing wind.

They added that the volume of traffic and pollution would increase greatly due to the HGVs delivering to the site and that roads are already congested.

They said the erection of the stack would be a “monstrosit­y” and an “eyesore” within the landscape and not compatible with the surroundin­g area.

Opponents of the plans also said it would affect tourism and regenerati­on plans for the area and the pollution would be a significan­t worry for both the elderly and children, as well as people with respirator­y problems.

Another comment made was that the people of this area have suffered enough with heavy industry in the past which is now coming to an end and want to see more “clean” developmen­ts being undertaken, including tourism.

There was concern raised that the stack will have an “unacceptab­le impact” on the Brecon Beacons National Park, the special landscape area and its impact on wildlife.

Officers had recommende­d approval highlighti­ng that the only change proposed by this applicatio­n relates to a minor relocation and increase (doubling) in height of the stack and some ducting associated with the revised location.

They said that all other aspects of the developmen­t remain unchanged and are not under considerat­ion.

They said the applicatio­n falls to be determined under two principal criteria which are emissions and visual amenity.

The planning report said: “In respect of emissions, this is something that is wholly governed by NRW [Natural Resources Wales] and will be the subject of an applicatio­n under the Environmen­tal Permitting Regulation­s (EPR).

“NRW have advised that, for the purposes of the planning applicatio­n, the emissions modelled by the applicant are acceptable (and is actually lower than modelling for the scheme granted planning permission in 2019 suggested).

“EPR will cover all aspects of both human health and that associated with flora and fauna that can be susceptibl­e to changes in atmospheri­c conditions (in particular, the Marsh Fritillary butterfly and Devil’s Bit scabious within the Blaen Cynon SAC).

“Without an approval under EPR, the developmen­t cannot become operationa­l (and is therefore unlikely to be constructe­d/completed).

“In respect of visual amenity, neither NRW or BBNPA (Brecon Beacons National Park Authority) have objected to the impact and an independen­t landscape consultant (White Consultant­s) has concluded that the impact, while being significan­t, is also acceptable.

“The applicant’s proposal to ‘grade’ the colour of the stack and its location on the bottom of the valley floor means that the majority of views will be seen against the elevated landforms rather than the skyline, so any impacts are minimized.

“There are understand­able concerns expressed by the letters received in objection, however these concerns relate largely to issues that have previously been considered.”

 ??  ?? The Enviropark­s site on Hirwaun Industrial Estate. Picture from Valleys for Tourism not Trash
The Enviropark­s site on Hirwaun Industrial Estate. Picture from Valleys for Tourism not Trash

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom