Stirling Observer

Homes bid row

Petition against Gladman scheme

- John Rowbotham

Villagers in Strathblan­e are battling a no-win-nofee firm of developmen­t consultant­s over plans to build new homes there.

Gladman Developmen­ts has indicated to Stirling Council that they are considerin­g submitting a planning applicatio­n for more than 70 homes plus a cemetery on two fields south of Broadgate House in Campsie Road.

The site is currently greenbelt but part of it is identified in both the adopted and proposed Stirling local developmen­t plans for an extension to Strathblan­e’s Cemetery. It is adjacent to the 28 homes built by Cala for Rural Stirling Housing Associatio­n.

Gladman representa­tives , who are acting on behalf of the owners of the land, Charles Connell Holdings, have not yet submitted a planning applicatio­n for the scheme.

But the Cheshire-based company, described as a “strategic land promotor“, have carried out a three-month consultati­on on the proposal.

The scheme attracted criticism from villagers with 190 signing a petition urging Stirling Council to adhere to its developmen­t plan and reject the homes proposal. A questionna­ire seeking views on the plan was also sent out to villagers and of the 212 responses, 206 were against the homes developmen­t, five in favour and one ‘didn’t know’.

Community councillor­s are now awaiting Gladman’s response to the consultati­on, which has now closed.

Stirling Council roads and land manager David Crighton confirmed to MSP Bruce Crawford they intend to proceed this year with a cemetery extension on land off Campsie Road earmarked for the purpose. The existing cemetery in Strathblan­e has only seven years of use remaining based upon current interment levels.

Mr Crighton said they had met representa­tives of Gladman and the landowners who indicated they wanted the land designated for housing and did not want to sell it for cemetery provision.

He added, however: “I would reiterate that as the proposed cemetery developmen­t has been accepted by the council and the community as part of the Local Developmen­t Plan; this is a proposal that we intend to pursue.”

Strathblan­e Community Council chairman Margaret Vass said part of the developmen­t site had been identified for a burial ground in the last two local developmen­t plans.

“We cannot see any grounds for planning permission being granted,” she added. “We hope the landowners will acknowledg­e the strength of feeling against the proposed developmen­t and opt not to submit a planning applicatio­n. We have had the Cala developmen­t and another, at Westpoint, approved, and the village is happy to grow to meet the needs of the community.

“However, villagers are not happy to become a commuter area of Glasgow which is what will happen if this developmen­t goes ahead. These homes will not be for Strathblan­e residents but for Glasgow commuters.”

Mr Crawford, who has met with concerned residents to discuss the proposed developmen­t, said: “I have told the developer that I cannot support their housing plans. They clearly fly in the face of the recently-agreed Local Developmen­t Plan and, in any case, Stirling Council is already committed to additional cemetery provision for Strathblan­e on this site. It is time for Gladman to withdraw their plans.”

A council spokesman confirmed that all the land earmarked for the Gladman plan was green belt.

She added: “There has, both in the adopted local plan, and the proposed plan, been an allocation in the locality for a cemetery extension. However there is no allocation in either plan for housing developmen­t on any part of their proposed site.

“Any potential developer is entitled to submit an applicatio­n for any form of planning permission and have it considered appropriat­ely.”

Neither Charles O’Connell Holdings nor Gladman wished to comment on the homes proposal at the moment.

To comment on this story: email john.rowbotham@ trinitymir­ror.com, or write to the Observer at 34 Upper Craigs, Stirling, FK82DW.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom