Stirling Observer

Four woodland homes vetoed

Kippendavi­e scheme is rejected

- Kaiya Marjoriban­ks

A bid to build four houses in woodland in Dunblane has been unanimousl­y rejected by Stirling Council’s planning panel.

The IGM Dalgleish (1991) Trust had sought to create an urban woodland, four houses plus vehicle access at Kippendavi­e Wood.

However, Stirling Council planners recommende­d refusal of the applicatio­n considerin­g it to be contrary to the Local Developmen­t Plan. They said the proposal did not provide appropriat­e measures for safeguardi­ng the natural environmen­t, that the design and scale of the houses were out of character and the developmen­t would encroach “unsympathe­tically” onto greenfield land.

The planners also felt the proposals would lead to “a significan­t loss of biodiversi­ty without adequate provision being made on or off site to mitigate against such loss”.

The site at the northern leg of the woodland is owned by the applicant and has been the subject of three previous planning applicatio­ns one for 20 flats submitted in 2002 but withdrawn, one for five houses in January 2015 which was also withdrawn, and one for four houses which was refused by the planning panel in April 2015.

The refusal at that time had seen the panel consider to overturn policy considerat­ions if presented with a sound woodland management plan.

The latest applicatio­n was brought before the panel last October, when planning officers accepted the new housing as enabling necessary capital for woodland improvemen­ts and a mechanism for future management and maintenanc­e.

However, the same applicatio­n was this week being recommende­d for refusal, with the planners saying they didn’t feel a Section 75 legal agreement was enough to protect the woodland.

Speaking on behalf of the developers at this week’s panel hearing, John McCallum said: “This area has been overgrown and is unsafe for access by the public. I would appeal to members not to lose sight of this objective. There would be the formation of new paths suitable for use by all users and drainage provided for surface water.”

He pointed out that the applicant had agreed to set aside £40,000 for the management and maintenanc­e of the woodland for around 14 years.

A total of 19 objections had been received from 17 households in the area, however, citing concerns such as impact on woodland, open space and biodiversi­ty.

Speaking on behalf of objectors, Ochiltree resident Alex Cranston said: “If this applicatio­n is approved the decision will be irreversib­le and it will rob the community of a valuable asset.

“I have witnessed the considerab­le expense there has been in a bid to develop this woodland. I have seen no evidence of significan­t sums being spent on maintenanc­e of the woods. The landowner is seeking to be rewarded for its own negligence of the woodland. Scottish planning policy states that poor maintenanc­e and negligence shouldn’t be used as justificat­ion for other purposes. This is a thinly veiled speculativ­e applicatio­n and nothing to do with conservati­on.”

Mr Cranston said the plans overlooked at least nine Local Developmen­t Plan policies and that Kippendavi­e Woods was the last area of deciduous woodland in Dunblane and “invaluable”, adding that rejection of the applicatio­n would free the way for the community to progress hopes of looking into how to protect the site through projects like the Woodland Trust.

Panel members unanimousl­y rejected the applicatio­n.

It will rob the community of a valuable asset

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom