Stirling Observer

Changes will improve our planning process

-

Dear Editor Before the last election, the Scottish Conservati­ves made a promise to be the strong opposition to the SNP and hold the Scottish Government to account.

The new planning bill which was passed by Holyrood recently is a good example of where we have used our position to improve government policy.

As someone who served for nearly two decades as a local councillor, I am acutely aware of the challenges that arise from the planning system and have always been especially enthusiast­ic to engage with our residents and all members of our communitie­s.

Also, most people I believe, realise that we simply need more homes and are therefore supportive of good-quality developmen­t if the right infrastruc­ture is put in place to support it.

But until now it has all too often seemed that the views of our communitie­s are largely ignored in the planning process. Big developers seem to get away with largescale, poorly designed schemes in the face of widespread opposition and where there is insufficie­nt capacity in our schools, health service and roads network. This is not fair, and something had to be done about it.

We looked seriously at proposals for what some prefer to call an “equal right of appeal” that would allow communitie­s to challenge some decisions to the Scottish Government but on close examinatio­n – and by possessing actual past experience of the process – we concluded such a change would simply slow up the planning process and stifle developmen­t.

But it was also clear that maintainin­g the status quo was not an option. We wanted to seek a compromise and balance the need for more housing and developmen­t with giving a greater voice to our communitie­s. To achieve this, we put forward an amendment for mediation between developers and communitie­s to be an integral part of the whole planning process.

Our party understand­s attempting to bring two very different points of view together can often be difficult, but by trying to find areas of common ground early on we can try to address any issues that our communitie­s might have before developers obtain their planning permission.

I was very pleased that we were successful in getting this amendment added to the bill.

Another positive developmen­t with this bill is the introducti­on of Local Place Plans, which will allow communitie­s to have a greater say on setting the priorities for developmen­t in their area. We managed to strengthen these to ensure that our councils must take proper account of them when developing their own Local Developmen­t Plans.

Good planning requires our communitie­s, developers and councils to work together to help build the houses we need whilst taking into account the ambitions of our communitie­s.

Whilst there are never going to be any perfect solutions the changes in this bill will very much help to improve our collective planning process for the future.

Alexander Stewart MSP for Scottish Conservati­ve and Unionist (Mid Scotland and Fife) Spokespers­on and Shadow Minister for Local Government

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom